 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
stealing another idea. Saw Tek's excellent paint texture on a decent
monitor and had to try it just one more time. Idea courtesy Tor, of course.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'trefoil.jpg' (69 KB)
Preview of image 'trefoil.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gotta hand it to you Shay, that's PDG.
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Shay wrote:
> stealing another idea. Saw Tek's excellent paint texture on a decent
> monitor and had to try it just one more time. Idea courtesy Tor, of course.
I like it !
Is the texture a modified version of Tek's metallic paint texture ?
http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/thread/%3C3ec17ce5@news.povray.org%3E
--
Tor Olav
http://subcube.net
http://subcube.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Shay <sah### [at] simcoparts com> wrote:
> stealing another idea. Saw Tek's excellent paint texture on a decent
> monitor and had to try it just one more time. Idea courtesy Tor, of course.
>
> -Shay
OK, now, that one's really cool. Although so was the other one. And
Tek's_ture looks like it was made just for your surface.
For myself, if I didn't have Tor's ideas to steal, I'd just be left with
stealing from you, or Christoph, or Gilles, or Mike Williams, or Fredrich
Lohmuller, or . . . . ("If I can see farther than the end of my nose, it
is only because I am standing on the feet of giants" to paraphrase Newton.)
Dave Matthews
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tor Olav Kristensen wrote:
> Is the texture a modified version of Tek's metallic paint texture ?
>
Not unless changing the pigment counts as modifying. :)
I made this on a monitor much too poor for any texture development, much
less tweaking.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Dave Matthews wrote:
>
> OK, now, that one's really cool. Although so was the other one.
> And Tek's_ture looks like it was made just for your surface.
Yes, I am quite impressed by that texture. Can't take credit for much of
the "coolness." It's inherent in the shape. I just made the cleanest
version I could. Many, many, many, many triangles.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
> that's PDG.
TY
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Shay" <sah### [at] simcopartscom> wrote in message
news:418672e5$1@news.povray.org...
> St. wrote:
> > that's PDG.
>
> TY
Well, I've always been impressed with your images and your
'minimalist style with Zap'.
It's a style that I couldn't do, so I enjoy what I see. What you've
done with the design in this image is impossible for any machine to
make, (CNC/CAD/CAM, etc.)
I like it when people push the boundaries a little. I would like
this image as an oil painting as it looks now.
~Steve~
> -Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
> Well, I've always been impressed with your images and
> your 'minimalist style with Zap'.
Thank you. I'm proud of my work ethic on quick images like this one.
> It's a style that I couldn't do,
Bah! You could do it easily. There's a trick to it. Form every shape
very carefully, smooth out every corner, pull every vertex tight, make
sure nothing is stretched, and "Zap" happens on its own. Of course,
lifting a cool texture and cool idea from other posts doesn't hurt. :)
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Shay wrote:
> Tor Olav Kristensen wrote:
>
>> Is the texture a modified version of Tek's metallic paint texture ?
>>
>
> Not unless changing the pigment counts as modifying. :)
> I made this on a monitor much too poor for any texture development, much
> less tweaking.
Hmmm... - Let me see if I got that right:
You used that texture but with another pigment ?
--
Tor Olav
http://subcube.net
http://subcube.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
