 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I know this one must have been done like a thousand times, but hey,
that's nothing compared to the zillions of RSOCPs out there ;)
It consists of 808705 objects, taking 592861916 bytes (=565 MB) memory.
Resizing and JPEG didn't do the image any good, a better version can be
found at
http://www.torfbold.com/images/box-fractal.png [PNG, 1024x768, 1MB]
Comments/Criticism appreciated as always!
Have a nice & sunny weekend,
Florian
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'box-fractal.jpg' (104 KB)
Preview of image 'box-fractal.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Florian Brucker wrote:
> I know this one must have been done like a thousand times, but hey,
> that's nothing compared to the zillions of RSOCPs out there ;)
>
> It consists of 808705 objects, taking 592861916 bytes (=565 MB) memory.
> Resizing and JPEG didn't do the image any good, a better version can be
> found at
>
> http://www.torfbold.com/images/box-fractal.png [PNG, 1024x768, 1MB]
>
> Comments/Criticism appreciated as always!
>
> Have a nice & sunny weekend,
> Florian
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
That neat and interresting. Recursives macros are not in my
possibilities at this time... maybe someday... ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Impressive. It lacks contrast on my LCD monitor though.
I started to play with a similar idea using tanglecubes but the
project seems to have been lost - ie too slow for my patience.
Alf
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> That neat and interresting. Recursives macros are not in my
> possibilities at this time... maybe someday... ;-)
Thanks :)
Recursive macros are not in your possibilites? Well, they are certainly
much easier than the great stuff you're posting (e.g. those great pins :)
Florian
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Impressive.
Thanks :)
> It lacks contrast on my LCD monitor though.
Do you mean the image in general or the fractal? The colors of the
fractal are all pretty equal, and the reflection in the finish adds to
this of course. Never used a LCD, so I can't say for sure if that's the
reason...
Florian
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
LightBeam wrote:
>>
> That neat and interresting. Recursives macros are not in my
possibilities at this time... maybe someday... ;-)
#macro Recurse ( Inter )
#debug concat ( "\n\n\n payload ", str ( Inter,0,0) )
#if ( Inter )
Recurse ( Inter - 1 )
#end
#end
Recurse ( 5 )
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Florian Brucker" <tor### [at] torfbold com> wrote in message
news:412696b2$1@news.povray.org...
> > It lacks contrast on my LCD monitor though.
> Do you mean the image in general or the fractal?
The fractal is OK. The image, on my LCD, looks like you used light or
pastel pigments. Even the shadows are weak. This is a problem with my
monitor, _not_ your image.
Alf
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
