From: Steven Pigeon
Subject: Re: It looks hot...
Date: 29 Jun 2004 00:15:57
Message: <40e0ecfd$1@news.povray.org>
That's pretty cool.
--
Steven Pigeon, Ph. D.
ste### [at] stevenpigeoncom
ste### [at] videotronca
"Mike Raiford" <mra### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:40e07c50$1@news.povray.org...
> Some sort of heating element ...>>> Found while playing with radiosity and emitting media>>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
From: Marc Jacquier
Subject: Re: It looks hot...
Date: 29 Jun 2004 03:18:24
Message: <40e117c0$1@news.povray.org>
40e07c50$1@news.povray.org...
> Some sort of heating element ...>>> Found while playing with radiosity and emitting media>>
Really love it
rendered with pov 3.6?
I have some scenes to test with unclipped radiosity
Marc
From: Jaime Vives Piqueres
Subject: Re: It looks hot...
Date: 29 Jun 2004 04:20:44
Message: <40e1265c$1@news.povray.org>
Mike Raiford wrote:
> Some sort of heating element ...
Nice, looks very semblant to my old electrical stove, wich has 2 of
these. And it also is more intense at the center... is this casual or
intended?
--
Jaime
From: Michael Raiford
Subject: Re: It looks hot...
Date: 29 Jun 2004 06:06:39
Message: <40e13f2f$1@news.povray.org>
"Marc Jacquier" <nos### [at] wanadoofr> wrote in message
news:40e117c0$1@news.povray.org...
>> 40e07c50$1@news.povray.org...> Really love it> rendered with pov 3.6?> I have some scenes to test with unclipped radiosity
Yep, 3.6. The unclipped radiosity really makes a difference.
From: Michael Raiford
Subject: Re: It looks hot...
Date: 29 Jun 2004 06:07:45
Message: <40e13f71$1@news.povray.org>
"Jaime Vives Piqueres" <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote in message
news:40e1265c$1@news.povray.org...
>> Nice, looks very semblant to my old electrical stove, wich has 2 of> these. And it also is more intense at the center... is this casual or> intended?
Thanks.
It was intentional that it be more intense at the center.
com
ste### [at] videotron