POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : more landscape Server Time
13 Nov 2024 03:49:02 EST (-0500)
  more landscape (Message 1 to 8 of 8)  
From: Abe
Subject: more landscape
Date: 28 Jun 2004 14:19:44
Message: <40e06140@news.povray.org>
All this LOTW stuff gets me itching to render some landscapes as well.

This one is definately not random. It is a spin off from a scene 
template I was trying out for taking some basic Terragen settings and 
translating them to POV (nothing for the textures or atmosphere though). 
I restricted the scene to a regular height field with surface texturing 
only. Atmosphere is fog. Render time about 00:06:30 on a 2.2GHz PC.

Abe


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'terrain.jpg' (136 KB)

Preview of image 'terrain.jpg'
terrain.jpg


 

From: Jaime Vives Piqueres
Subject: Re: more landscape
Date: 28 Jun 2004 14:45:10
Message: <40e06736$1@news.povray.org>
Abe wrote:
> This one is definately not random. It is a spin off from a scene 
> template I was trying out for taking some basic Terragen settings and 
> translating them to POV (nothing for the textures or atmosphere though). 
> I restricted the scene to a regular height field with surface texturing 
> only. Atmosphere is fog. Render time about 00:06:30 on a 2.2GHz PC.

   Impressive. Very convincing, and with only a few elements... great!

   Are these mountains from a pigment function, or real height data?

--
Jaime


Post a reply to this message

From: Remy Closset
Subject: Re: more landscape
Date: 28 Jun 2004 15:13:46
Message: <40e06dea$1@news.povray.org>
quite realistic
I remember a ride, last year in the french alps. It's exactly the same

greatings




news:40e06140@news.povray.org...
> All this LOTW stuff gets me itching to render some landscapes as well.
>
> This one is definately not random. It is a spin off from a scene
> template I was trying out for taking some basic Terragen settings and
> translating them to POV (nothing for the textures or atmosphere though).
> I restricted the scene to a regular height field with surface texturing
> only. Atmosphere is fog. Render time about 00:06:30 on a 2.2GHz PC.
>
> Abe
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


Post a reply to this message

From: Abe
Subject: Re: more landscape
Date: 28 Jun 2004 17:00:34
Message: <40e086f2$1@news.povray.org>
>   Are these mountains from a pigment function, or real height data?

No real world data if I remember right - generated either in Terragen or 
Worldmachine.

Abe


Post a reply to this message

From: Nathan O'Brien
Subject: Re: more landscape
Date: 28 Jun 2004 17:07:04
Message: <opsaboxz0jqe14i4@user-uzkaejdv52>
Nice work Abe. Can't wait to see a landscape including the clouds you  
posted earlier.

Nathan O'Brien


Post a reply to this message

From: CornellBox
Subject: Re: more landscape
Date: 28 Jun 2004 17:49:41
Message: <40e09275@news.povray.org>
Really nice job! Add a few clouds and it would match into every good travel
catalogue.

CB

"Abe" <bul### [at] taconicnet> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:40e06140@news.povray.org...
> All this LOTW stuff gets me itching to render some landscapes as well.
>
> This one is definately not random. It is a spin off from a scene
> template I was trying out for taking some basic Terragen settings and
> translating them to POV (nothing for the textures or atmosphere though).
> I restricted the scene to a regular height field with surface texturing
> only. Atmosphere is fog. Render time about 00:06:30 on a 2.2GHz PC.
>
> Abe
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


Post a reply to this message

From: marabou
Subject: Re: more landscape
Date: 2 Jul 2004 09:34:16
Message: <40e56457@news.povray.org>
Abe wrote:

> All this LOTW stuff gets me itching to render some landscapes as
> well.
> 
> This one is definately not random. It is a spin off from a scene
> template I was trying out for taking some basic Terragen settings
> and translating them to POV (nothing for the textures or atmosphere
> though). I restricted the scene to a regular height field with
> surface texturing only. Atmosphere is fog. Render time about
> 00:06:30 on a 2.2GHz PC.
> 
> Abe

maybe clouds or flares would make it quite more realistic.
or a lila cow... ;-)


Post a reply to this message

From: Marc Jacquier
Subject: Re: more landscape
Date: 2 Jul 2004 10:45:54
Message: <40e57522$1@news.povray.org>

40e56457@news.povray.org...
> maybe clouds or flares would make it quite more realistic.
> or a lila cow... ;-)
>
Oh well a lila cow is only realistic beside a marmot wrapping aluminium foil
around chocolate bars  :-)

Marc


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.