 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I don`t have a Core at home, alas,
but I have a few computers. So I
can render plenty
comments ?
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Dominos_00.jpg' (186 KB)
Preview of image 'Dominos_00.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Steven Pigeon wrote:
> I don`t have a Core at home, alas,
> but I have a few computers. So I
> can render plenty
>
> comments ?
Nice! But I'd definitely like to see it with area light and focal blur.
Those are the key elements to a photorealistic image :) Now the image is
too left-weighted so you could maybe add a few dominos to background and
right and focus the light a bit there too.
Severi
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This is mean to be a "splash screen": the
area at right is empty so that text will be
legible.
Yes, focar blur, radiosity and all are
for later.
The overall geometry of the picture may
change, say a more 16:9 aspect ratio or
even flatter...
What about the lackered finish ?
"Severi Salminen" <sev### [at] NOT_THISsiba fi> wrote in message
news:4087d87a$1@news.povray.org...
> Steven Pigeon wrote:
>
> > I don`t have a Core at home, alas,
> > but I have a few computers. So I
> > can render plenty
> >
> > comments ?
>
> Nice! But I'd definitely like to see it with area light and focal blur.
> Those are the key elements to a photorealistic image :) Now the image is
> too left-weighted so you could maybe add a few dominos to background and
> right and focus the light a bit there too.
>
>
> Severi
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nice. I thing you've rendered that floor before and it impressed me then.
Nice spotlight, adds a likeable emphasis. The texture on the sides of the
dominoes is cool but the tops seem too smooth. The set I have, has a
recessed top, only about half a mm, and a rough (crackle-like) bumpy
texture. Finally, the white spots seem too clean perhaps dirty them up.
V. Nice!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Steven Pigeon wrote:
> I don`t have a Core at home, alas,
> but I have a few computers. So I
> can render plenty
>
> comments ?
>
>
>
>
somehow the scale is wrong, depth of domino is too much ??
must be at 6 inch on the short edge ?
stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"stephen parkinson" <ste### [at] zmemw16demoncouk> wrote in message
news:4087ffc9@news.povray.org...
> Steven Pigeon wrote:
> somehow the scale is wrong, depth of domino is too much ??
>
> must be at 6 inch on the short edge ?
?
I actually used a galliper to mesure dominoes
I have home. The lengths are accurate within 1/10
of mm, so are the holes.
These vary, I suppose, with different manufacturers
>
> stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Felbrigg" <som### [at] microsoftcom> wrote in message
news:4087de53@news.povray.org...
> Nice. I thing you've rendered that floor before and it impressed me then.
Yes, eventually I'll get more fabrics. This one I had
handy.
> Nice spotlight, adds a likeable emphasis. The texture on the sides of the
> dominoes is cool but the tops seem too smooth. The set I have, has a
> recessed top, only about half a mm, and a rough (crackle-like) bumpy
> texture. Finally, the white spots seem too clean perhaps dirty them up.
Yes, good idea to crackle the dots...!
>
> V. Nice!
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Steven Pigeon wrote:
> "stephen parkinson" <ste### [at] zmemw16demoncouk> wrote in message
> news:4087ffc9@news.povray.org...
>
>>Steven Pigeon wrote:
>
>
>>somehow the scale is wrong, depth of domino is too much ??
>>
>>must be at 6 inch on the short edge ?
>
>
> ?
>
> I actually used a galliper to mesure dominoes
> I have home. The lengths are accurate within 1/10
> of mm, so are the holes.
>
> These vary, I suppose, with different manufacturers
>
>
>>stephen
>
>
>
whats the scale on the pattern of the carpet (repeat of pattern) ?
carpets i've seen, suggest a few inches almost a foot
on that basis, domino looks about 6" on short side ?
stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It's not carpet, it's fabric. Like a
table cloth if you like. And that too
is pretty much up to scale. I didn't
manage to give it the velvelty look
it actually has... Working on this
too
"stephen parkinson" <ste### [at] zmemw16demoncouk> wrote in message
news:40880f32$1@news.povray.org...
> Steven Pigeon wrote:
> > "stephen parkinson" <ste### [at] zmemw16demoncouk> wrote in message
> > news:4087ffc9@news.povray.org...
> >
> >>Steven Pigeon wrote:
> >
> >
> >>somehow the scale is wrong, depth of domino is too much ??
> >>
> >>must be at 6 inch on the short edge ?
> >
> >
> > ?
> >
> > I actually used a galliper to mesure dominoes
> > I have home. The lengths are accurate within 1/10
> > of mm, so are the holes.
> >
> > These vary, I suppose, with different manufacturers
> >
> >
> >>stephen
> >
> >
> >
>
> whats the scale on the pattern of the carpet (repeat of pattern) ?
> carpets i've seen, suggest a few inches almost a foot
> on that basis, domino looks about 6" on short side ?
>
> stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Steven Pigeon wrote:
> I don`t have a Core at home, alas,
> but I have a few computers. So I
> can render plenty
>
> comments ?
I like the pattern. Haven't you used that one before, though, with some
isolinear chips or something? :-) It rings a bell.
--
Respectfully,
Dan P
http://<broken link>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
