 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Meant for print, but still very PiBIsh in my opinion.
An abstraction of a specific style of architectural drawing. I've messed
with this off and on for a while, but have not until now been able to
get the shading and level of complexity just right. Steven Pigeon's
'Radiosity Experiment' post re-kindled my interest in this subject.
Thank you, Steven.
Black border added in paint to show how this will sit high (although not
so tight) in the (white) frame.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'aptresize.jpg' (49 KB)
Preview of image 'aptresize.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Shay wrote:
> Meant for print, but still very PiBIsh in my opinion.
>
> An abstraction of a specific style of architectural drawing.
Excellent work. It immediately captures the feel, makes you say, "Hmm.
What new office building is. . . . wait a minute!" And your eye is
drawn down to the improbabilities (architecturally speaking) and back up
to examine more details. I really like this one!
Care to share a few details about the texture/settings?
Dave Matthews
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
How do jou suppose to get from one 'level' to the
next. There seems no space for stairs nor elevators.
Shay wrote:
> Meant for print, but still very PiBIsh in my opinion.
>
> An abstraction of a specific style of architectural drawing. I've messed
> with this off and on for a while, but have not until now been able to
> get the shading and level of complexity just right. Steven Pigeon's
> 'Radiosity Experiment' post re-kindled my interest in this subject.
> Thank you, Steven.
>
> Black border added in paint to show how this will sit high (although not
> so tight) in the (white) frame.
>
> -Shay
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Shay wrote:
> Meant for print, but still very PiBIsh in my opinion.
>
> An abstraction of a specific style of architectural drawing. I've messed
> with this off and on for a while, but have not until now been able to
> get the shading and level of complexity just right. Steven Pigeon's
> 'Radiosity Experiment' post re-kindled my interest in this subject.
> Thank you, Steven.
>
> Black border added in paint to show how this will sit high (although not
> so tight) in the (white) frame.
>
> -Shay
Wow; cool!
I'm trying to imagine what it would look like if you made the windows
reflective, added a little specular to them, and added sky_sphere {
pigment { wrinkles } } to the scene. :-)
--
Respectfully,
Dan P
http://<broken link>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
v. Nice
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Dave Matthews" <dma### [at] nospam net> wrote in message
news:4086cc3c$1@news.povray.org...
|
| Excellent work. It immediately captures the feel, makes you say,
| "Hmm. What new office building is. . . . wait a minute!" And
| your eye is drawn down to the improbabilities (architecturally
| speaking) and back up to examine more details. I really like
| this one!
Awesome! That's exactly what I wanted to get across. Thank you.
|
| Care to share a few details about the texture/settings?
Sure, but you'll likely be disappointed. The textures, as in all of my
recent pictures, are just pigments with either ambient 0 or 1. The
ambient 0 pigments in this picture are shaded with shadowless, parallel
lights. An additional, dim, shadowless but not parallel light "punches
out" the picture just a bit from the screen.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Dan P" <dan### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
news:40871abe$1@news.povray.org...
|
| I'm trying to imagine what it would look like if you made the
| windows reflective, added a little specular to them, and added
| sky_sphere { pigment { wrinkles } } to the scene. :-)
Gave it a shot just now. After a few lines, I had do conclude that I
just don't have the patience to find out.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Dont you just want to shuv a light into the middle! :-) I keep getting
these urges.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Shay" <sah### [at] simcopartscom> wrote in message
news:4086c2e4@news.povray.org...
To me, that's looking forward in 'living style' Shay. Nice design,
'nice' image.
~Steve~
> -Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi, Shay,
> An abstraction of a specific style of architectural drawing. I've messed
> with this off and on for a while, but have not until now been able to
> get the shading and level of complexity just right.
I like this image! The clean, bare look is appealing to me. I do
architectural renderings, too. Sometimes the test renders at q5 aa 0.6 in
quick_color look better than the fully textured versions. I'm going to post
some here over the weekend. Check 'em out!
Your picture is great the way it is...don't fool around with it any further.
--
Michael Brendan Hurley
http://www.geocities.com/mbrendanh/indxx02.html
mbh### [at] sabernet
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
