 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ok, I've reduced the wings to about 40 or so and it took just over
71/2 hours to render. When I tried it the other night, I woke up to
find that it was on line 200 at 7 hours, so I think I found a good
compromise with the max_trace_level set at 30. Yes, the bullrushes
aren't good yet. ;)
Comments always appreciated.
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'dragonfly2.jpg' (158 KB)
Preview of image 'dragonfly2.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
> Ok, I've reduced the wings to about 40 or so and it took just over
> 71/2 hours to render. When I tried it the other night, I woke up to
> find that it was on line 200 at 7 hours, so I think I found a good
> compromise with the max_trace_level set at 30. Yes, the bullrushes
> aren't good yet. ;)
>
> Comments always appreciated.
>
> ~Steve~
Cool! An indigo (0.4, 0.6, 0.8) light source pointing straight down and
shadowless might add depth.
--
Respectfully,
Dan P
http://<broken link>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Ok, I've reduced the wings to about 40 or so and it took just over
> 71/2 hours to render. When I tried it the other night, I woke up to
> find that it was on line 200 at 7 hours, so I think I found a good
> compromise with the max_trace_level set at 30. Yes, the bullrushes
> aren't good yet. ;)
>
> Comments always appreciated.
Wouldn't using media go faster? Just a thought... (adaptive sampling &
all that...)
Andrew @ home.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Andrew C on Mozilla" <voi### [at] dev null> wrote in message
news:40799ab3$1@news.povray.org...
> > Ok, I've reduced the wings to about 40 or so and it took just
over
> > 71/2 hours to render. When I tried it the other night, I woke up
to
> > find that it was on line 200 at 7 hours, so I think I found a good
> > compromise with the max_trace_level set at 30. Yes, the bullrushes
> > aren't good yet. ;)
> >
> > Comments always appreciated.
>
> Wouldn't using media go faster? Just a thought... (adaptive sampling
&
> all that...)
Quite possibly, but then, how would I get the shape of the wings
using media? Keep the present wings, but use media instead of glass?
Is that what you were thinking?
~Steve~
>
> Andrew @ home.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote in message news:4077d7ca@news.povray.org...
> Ok, I've reduced the wings to about 40 or so and it took just over
> 71/2 hours to render. When I tried it the other night, I woke up to
> find that it was on line 200 at 7 hours, so I think I found a good
> compromise with the max_trace_level set at 30. Yes, the bullrushes
> aren't good yet. ;)
>
> Comments always appreciated.
>
> ~Steve~
>
>
>
>
Very cool look dragonfly. The lighting could use some help, it's hard to see
some of the details. I love the eyes, wings, and hair on it's back. What
kind of computer are you running this on? just curious, wondering if 7+
hours is a long time, or a short time ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote in message news:4077d7ca@news.povray.org...
looking nice. My old lady has a dragon fly with flames surrounding it
tattooed on her back.
The one weak spot is the connection of the wings to the thorax. I
figured out that this is why it looks robotic to me. Nice legs.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
