 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This is the entire scene. Not bad, but...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Radiosity samples calculated: 1739302 (25.10 percent)
Radiosity samples reused: 5191566
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Time For Parse: 0 hours 1 minutes 27.0 seconds (87 seconds)
Time For Trace: 3 hours 54 minutes 14.0 seconds (13811 seconds)
Total Time: 3 hours 51 minutes 38.0 seconds (13898 seconds)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
It seemed to scream down through the sky area in under 3 minutes, and when
it hit the grass, it went down to about 30pps
I used these rad settings.
global_settings {
assumed_gamma 0.8
ambient_light rgb .5
radiosity {
pretrace_start 0.08
pretrace_end 0.01
count 30
nearest_count 10
error_bound 0.5
recursion_limit 1
low_error_factor 1
gray_threshold 0.0
minimum_reuse 0.015
brightness 1
adc_bailout 0.01/2
}
max_trace_level 3
}
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'grass_test4_small.jpg' (47 KB)
Preview of image 'grass_test4_small.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Bryan Valencia
Subject: Re: Grass, test with radiosity lighting (ship detail)
Date: 1 Apr 2004 09:55:15
Message: <406c2d53@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'grass-test4_ship.jpg' (11 KB)
Preview of image 'grass-test4_ship.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Bryan Valencia
Subject: Re: Grass, test with radiosity lighting (grass detail)
Date: 1 Apr 2004 09:55:42
Message: <406c2d6e@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'grass-test4_grass.jpg' (16 KB)
Preview of image 'grass-test4_grass.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bryan Valencia wrote:
> Time For Trace: 3 hours 54 minutes 14.0 seconds (13811 seconds)
> Total Time: 3 hours 51 minutes 38.0 seconds (13898 seconds)
Cool. I want to know how to get the total time less than the time for
trace on *my* pictures! :-) Methinks there's some seconds->readable
flaws in there, or some hand editting.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA USA (PST)
I am in geosynchronous orbit, supported by
a quantum photon exchange drive....
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Time For Trace: 3 hours 54 minutes 14.0 seconds (13811 seconds)
>> Total Time: 3 hours 51 minutes 38.0 seconds (13898 seconds)
>
>
And note the strangeness of the Hour/Minute/Second system, whereby 13898
is actually less than 13811 ;-) This is worse than the Yard/Foot/Inch
system, or Pounds/Shillings/Whatever (not being British, I never figured
that one out.)
Dave Matthews
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Darren New" <dne### [at] san rrcom> wrote in message
news:406c3541@news.povray.org...
> Bryan Valencia wrote:
> > Time For Trace: 3 hours 54 minutes 14.0 seconds (13811 seconds)
> > Total Time: 3 hours 51 minutes 38.0 seconds (13898 seconds)
>
> Cool. I want to know how to get the total time less than the time for
> trace on *my* pictures! :-) Methinks there's some seconds->readable
> flaws in there, or some hand editting.
>
i think this happens on the linux version if you use the "Close image on
click" switch (what is it, +P?) and don't click the image for a while after
it is done rendering. i see it happen when i let a render go overnight. then
it's a matter of hours difference between the two.
-ross
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nope, no hand editing, BUT there's a problem with the gamma on my wife's
monitor, so when I brighten them up for posting, I'm washing them out
somewhat.
it looks about 5% darker on her screen than it does here.
oh yeah I traced it a lot larger than this and sized it down for posting.
"Darren New" <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote in message
news:406c3541@news.povray.org...
> Bryan Valencia wrote:
> > Time For Trace: 3 hours 54 minutes 14.0 seconds (13811 seconds)
> > Total Time: 3 hours 51 minutes 38.0 seconds (13898 seconds)
>
> Cool. I want to know how to get the total time less than the time for
> trace on *my* pictures! :-) Methinks there's some seconds->readable
> flaws in there, or some hand editting.
>
> --
> Darren New, San Diego CA USA (PST)
> I am in geosynchronous orbit, supported by
> a quantum photon exchange drive....
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hmmm that is odd. Of all the tings computers do well, counting should be a
cake-walk...
FYI this was on a WINXP system. Maybe it's like bytes where 13898 bytes =
13.57K
:D
"Ross Litscher" <rli### [at] everestkcnet> wrote in message
news:406c622e$1@news.povray.org...
> "Darren New" <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote in message
> news:406c3541@news.povray.org...
> > Bryan Valencia wrote:
> > > Time For Trace: 3 hours 54 minutes 14.0 seconds (13811 seconds)
> > > Total Time: 3 hours 51 minutes 38.0 seconds (13898 seconds)
> >
> > Cool. I want to know how to get the total time less than the time for
> > trace on *my* pictures! :-) Methinks there's some seconds->readable
> > flaws in there, or some hand editting.
> >
>
> i think this happens on the linux version if you use the "Close image on
> click" switch (what is it, +P?) and don't click the image for a while
after
> it is done rendering. i see it happen when i let a render go overnight.
then
> it's a matter of hours difference between the two.
>
> -ross
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bryan Valencia" <bry### [at] 209softwarecom> wrote in message
news:406c643f$1@news.povray.org...
> Hmmm that is odd. Of all the tings computers do well, counting should be
a
> cake-walk...
> FYI this was on a WINXP system. Maybe it's like bytes where 13898 bytes =
> 13.57K
> :D
>
>
well it seems to continue counting after the trace has ended. so if it was
an hour long trace, then the image remained "up" for 2 hours until i clicked
on it to close it, the Time For Trace would have been 1 hour, and the Total
Time would have been 3 hours. Maybe i have this backwards... i forget. and
maybe this is completely unrelated to your problem :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
