|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Final version, another radiosity settings, more efficient "light" emission
and better AA. 1h32'25".
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download '29Mars2004_final.jpg' (39 KB)
Preview of image '29Mars2004_final.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
PS : written "LightBeam" in braille this time...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> PS : written "LightBeam" in braille this time...
Call me a geek, but I was trying to find out if it was codified in some
strange octal code...
:-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
LB,
This image shows off some neat textural effects not usually seen. Nice
horizontal 'beams' on the CORP. They could be used for a convincing bar
of chocolate....
-Samuel Benge
LightBeam wrote:
> Final version, another radiosity settings, more efficient "light" emission
> and better AA. 1h32'25".
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Roberto Amorim wrote:
>> PS : written "LightBeam" in braille this time...
>
> Call me a geek, but I was trying to find out if it was codified in some
> strange octal code...
>
> :-)
Hehe. When my sister was taking a braille class she tried teaching me how
the basics work, so I sat down and tried teaching her how to count in
binary.
cool pic, lightbeam. I'd be so tempted to make the braille symbols chrome or
copper. resistance is futile! you know you want to ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
LightBeam wrote:
> Final version, another radiosity settings, more efficient "light" emission
> and better AA. 1h32'25".
It looks like a photograph of the new sign in your future office :-)
Very cool!!!
--
Respectfully,
Dan P
http://<broken link>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
LightBeam wrote:
> Final version, another radiosity settings, more efficient "light" emission
> and better AA. 1h32'25".
Afterthought: I particularly like the contrast between a name
"LightBeam" and a message on top that only a person who couldn't see it
would need :-)
--
Respectfully,
Dan P
http://<broken link>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Dan P wrote:
> Afterthought: I particularly like the contrast between a name
> "LightBeam" and a message on top that only a person who couldn't see it
> would need :-)
At my bank, at the drive-through window, they have instructions in
Braille. Hmmmm.
Dave Matthews
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Dave Matthews wrote:
> Dan P wrote:
>
>> Afterthought: I particularly like the contrast between a name
>> "LightBeam" and a message on top that only a person who couldn't see
>> it would need :-)
>
> At my bank, at the drive-through window, they have instructions in
> Braille. Hmmmm.
Hehehe. Maybe those are for the people who drive by sense of smell? :-)
--
Respectfully,
Dan P
http://<broken link>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |