|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Here's a more complete version of the frame. The second picture shows
the wind brace on the end, as Remy Closset mentioned. There are still a
few more changes to be made, such as, there really should be a smaller
door on the front left, since the back is north, and the barn is
supposed to be placed to the northeast of the house, given the
prevailing westerly winds in the midwest USA.
Thanks for all the advice on woodgrain, shingles, etc. More comments
greatly appreciated.
Dave Matthews
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'frameview03.jpg' (88 KB)
Download 'frameview05.jpg' (118 KB)
Preview of image 'frameview03.jpg'
Preview of image 'frameview05.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
(Talking to myself)
As I look at it, I'm sure that there should be trusses nearer to the
ends -- it looks far too flimsy this way, although the plans didn't show
this, and the details of tying in the faces clearly show that there are
not supposed to be trusses at the very ends.
Oh, well. It's easier to fix with POVRay than it would be in the other
real life.
Dave Matthews
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I love what you're doing. I will be very interested to see how this
progresses.
I really like the fact that you're taking the time to make this "real".
Most of us would simply do the outside of the barn. You're actually
building it piece by piece. When you're done, you'll have a model that will
be perfect inside and out. That's very commendable, imho.
Keep up the good work!
--
Jeremy
www.beantoad.com
"Dave Matthews" <dma### [at] nospamnet> wrote in message
news:40645a77@news.povray.org...
> Here's a more complete version of the frame. The second picture shows
> the wind brace on the end, as Remy Closset mentioned. There are still a
> few more changes to be made, such as, there really should be a smaller
> door on the front left, since the back is north, and the barn is
> supposed to be placed to the northeast of the house, given the
> prevailing westerly winds in the midwest USA.
>
> Thanks for all the advice on woodgrain, shingles, etc. More comments
> greatly appreciated.
>
> Dave Matthews
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Dave Matthews" <dma### [at] nospamnet> wrote in message
news:40645a77@news.povray.org...
> Here's a more complete version of the frame. The second picture shows
> the wind brace on the end, as Remy Closset mentioned. There are still a
> few more changes to be made, such as, there really should be a smaller
> door on the front left, since the back is north, and the barn is
> supposed to be placed to the northeast of the house, given the
> prevailing westerly winds in the midwest USA.
>
> Thanks for all the advice on woodgrain, shingles, etc. More comments
> greatly appreciated.
>
> Dave Matthews
The cows are clapping (have you ever seen cows clap? It's quite a sight!).
Beeeoooooooootiful.
You have a lot of patience to put together something this detailed.
--
- Respectfully,
Dan
http://<broken link>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jeremy M. Praay wrote:
> I love what you're doing. I will be very interested to see how this
> progresses.
>
> I really like the fact that you're taking the time to make this "real".
> Most of us would simply do the outside of the barn. You're actually
> building it piece by piece. When you're done, you'll have a model that will
> be perfect inside and out. That's very commendable, imho.
>
> Keep up the good work!
>
Thanks! I made some improvements over the weekend, but not enough to
warrant another post. After looking at a neighbor's (smaller but
similarly supported) barn, I decided that the trusses should be 12 feet
apart, rather than 16, and start closer to the barn face, so now there
are 7 trusses instead of 4, making it look much more substantial. Also
I noticed that the roof frame should extend 2 feet past the barn (for an
overhang), and that the center "point" (I can't remember its name)
should be only as wide as the haymow doors, and extend further out, to
protect the pulley assembly (again I forget the name) used to get the
hay into and out of the loft.
Anyway, I thought about trying to make just the outside, but my
observational skills are so poor, that usually someone comes by and says
"that barn (or whatever) couldn't even stand up the way you made it."
The nice thing about a barn is that, even when (if) it's completed,
you'll still be able to see all of the construction details (from the
inside). It's also interesting to see how far you can get with just one
primitive ("box.") I'm not sure if it's practical to go any further
with just boxes, since next come the lathes, and then the siding and
shingles, and that's a lot of boxes. I'm also toying with whether or
not to include the internal ventillation, although the engineering
aspects of that are really fascinating (how do you most efficiently
remove methane from the barn and put it out into the atmosphere, where
it belongs?)
Thanks for the interest and comments.
Dave Matthews
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Dan P wrote:
>
> The cows are clapping (have you ever seen cows clap? It's quite a sight!).
> Beeeoooooooootiful.
> You have a lot of patience to put together something this detailed.
>
LOL
Thanks!
Dave Matthews
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Heres a bit of shingles code for you, new and improoved!
#include "colors.inc"
#include "textures.inc"
#include "functions.inc"
#include "shapes.inc"
#include "woods.inc"
camera { location <10,0,-40> look_at <10,0,0> }
background { Blue }
light_source { <900, 560, -500> color White }
light_source { <-900, -560, -500> color White }
light_source { <900, 560, 500> color White }
light_source { <-900, -560, 500> color White }
#declare rStream = seed(0);
#macro
RowOfShingles(heightOfShingle,widthOfShingle,depthOfShingle,lengthOfRow,theT
exture)
#declare currentLength = 0;
#declare gapBetweenShingles = 0.1;
union {
#while(currentLength < lengthOfRow)
#declare thisShingleWidth = widthOfShingle +
(rand(rStream)*(widthOfShingle/2));
box {
<currentLength,0,0>,
<currentLength+thisShingleWidth,heightOfShingle
+rand(rStream),depthOfShingle>
texture {
theTexture
rotate
<rand(rStream)*360,rand(rStream)*360,rand(rStream)*360>
}
}
#declare currentLength = currentLength +
thisShingleWidth + gapBetweenShingles;
#end
}
#end
#macro
Rows(heightOfShingle,widthOfShingle,depthOfShingle,lengthOfRow,theTexture,Ro
wCount)
#declare myCount = 0;
union {
#while(myCount <= RowCount )
object {
RowOfShingles(3,2,0.5,40,theTexture)
translate
<0,(heightOfShingle/2)*myCount,(depthOfShingle*myCount)*-1>
}
#declare myCount = myCount + 1;
#end
}
#end
#declare myShingles = texture { pigment { P_WoodGrain1A color_map {
M_Wood9A } scale 4} };
object {
Rows(3,2,0.5,60,myShingles,12)
rotate <200,0,0>
translate <-10,20,0>
}
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks! That's very nice, very useable, and very understandable!
Dave Matthews
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: stephen parkinson
Subject: Re: Dairy Barn(Take 2) (88k and 118k)
Date: 29 Mar 2004 16:50:00
Message: <40689a08@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Dave Matthews wrote:
> Thanks! That's very nice, very useable, and very understandable!
>
> Dave Matthews
>
i must be rendering it incorrectly, it looked like chipboard
currently playing with a tutorial series wood_1..19.pov (its on other
box at moment, that i found semms to me, something is wrong with
rand(R)*360 on all of x,y,z for the rotate
istr something in docs about 5-10 degrees about x or z axes's, the
direction i think is really z (grain direction)
so i'm playing with different fading on some of the straighter grained
wood textures.
stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
stephen parkinson wrote:
> Dave Matthews wrote:
>
>> Thanks! That's very nice, very useable, and very understandable!
>>
>> Dave Matthews
>>
>
> i must be rendering it incorrectly, it looked like chipboard....
>
Oops, I hadn't tried it yet, just read it, and it looked good. Now I
better try it and try to figure it out.
Dave Matthews
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|