|
 |
I just read the offer and it seems that it is expected to output
concrete images (objects, cats, dogs, etc.), not abstract. But you can
argue that having abstract images makes it even harder to describe to
someone else.
Beyond that I think your images are too similar, It would be very
difficult to pick the right one without a lot of training. Maybe you
should vary them a little bit more, changing the colors for example.
JC
Micha Riser wrote:
> see p.unix "Paid Project offer (image gneration for security purposes)"
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
Interesting - with suitably chosen distortions and colours these could be
turned into faces I guess - the main point is to produce things such that
someone choosing one of them will be able to pick the same one again
a week or so later - and they will be jumbled up - so remembering
"it's the first one" will be no use.
I just assume that people are probably going to be best at remembering
a persons face, rather than abstract stuff - hence the idea to use faces,
but anything else that's rememberable would also suit I expect.
Chris.
"JC (Exether)" <no### [at] spam fr> wrote in message
news:3f2e8431$1@news.povray.org...
> I just read the offer and it seems that it is expected to output
> concrete images (objects, cats, dogs, etc.), not abstract. But you can
> argue that having abstract images makes it even harder to describe to
> someone else.
> Beyond that I think your images are too similar, It would be very
> difficult to pick the right one without a lot of training. Maybe you
> should vary them a little bit more, changing the colors for example.
>
> JC
>
> Micha Riser wrote:
> > see p.unix "Paid Project offer (image gneration for security purposes)"
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
