 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
... or possibly 'Skyhooked' would be a better title.
This image sort of evolved from modifying Gilles' MadPipe Macros to
conform to a given object shape - in this case to stay out of the
central globe, but within a certain distance, and to avoid blocking the
windows.
I've tried to get as much visual contrast as I could between the
complexity of the globes and the featureless background.
It needs something more - it's not really a finished scene - something
like hanging gardens or some kites or ... ideas would be appreciated :-)
Bye for now,
Mike Andrews.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'testpipe3.jpg' (57 KB)
Preview of image 'testpipe3.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I really like this image. It is very 'Gilles' though...;-)
All the best,
Andy Cocker
"Michael Andrews" <m.c### [at] rdg acuk> wrote in message
news:3ef438b7@news.povray.org...
> ... or possibly 'Skyhooked' would be a better title.
>
> This image sort of evolved from modifying Gilles' MadPipe Macros to
> conform to a given object shape - in this case to stay out of the
> central globe, but within a certain distance, and to avoid blocking the
> windows.
>
> I've tried to get as much visual contrast as I could between the
> complexity of the globes and the featureless background.
>
> It needs something more - it's not really a finished scene - something
> like hanging gardens or some kites or ... ideas would be appreciated :-)
>
> Bye for now,
> Mike Andrews.
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
A plane looking like a inverted submarine ?
Michael Andrews wrote:
> .... or possibly 'Skyhooked' would be a better title.
>
> This image sort of evolved from modifying Gilles' MadPipe Macros to
> conform to a given object shape - in this case to stay out of the
> central globe, but within a certain distance, and to avoid blocking the
> windows.
>
> I've tried to get as much visual contrast as I could between the
> complexity of the globes and the featureless background.
>
> It needs something more - it's not really a finished scene - something
> like hanging gardens or some kites or ... ideas would be appreciated :-)
>
> Bye for now,
> Mike Andrews.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Very very nice :)
As to what it needs, i have no idea - i would be tempted to leave as is,
render it huge and get it going as a poster on zaz
--
Rick
Kitty5 NewMedia http://Kitty5.com
POV-Ray News & Resources http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This looks really nice, I'd like to know what the view is like looking out
through the window of one of the globes.
> It needs something more - it's not really a finished scene - something
> like hanging gardens or some kites or ... ideas would be appreciated :-)
This might be a really bad suggestion that could ruin the image: perhaps show
some of whatever it is that they are hanging from. Is it a big metal support, or
a hovering ufo type object, or maybe the chains run all the way to the moon!
Slightly more sensible suggestions: a little more visual interest in the
background, maybe planes, very distant foggy mountains, clouds. Oh and a few
birds flying between the nearest orbs and the further ones.
Great picture but like someone else said, very Gilles. Not sure if that's a good
or a bad thing, but I like his work so I count it as good :)
--
Tek
http://www.evilsuperbrain.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hey Mike,
Nice image! Maybe you should show a person (living?) inside one of those
balls? :)
George
> ... or possibly 'Skyhooked' would be a better title.
>
> This image sort of evolved from modifying Gilles' MadPipe Macros to
> conform to a given object shape - in this case to stay out of the central
> globe, but within a certain distance, and to avoid blocking the windows.
>
> I've tried to get as much visual contrast as I could between the
> complexity of the globes and the featureless background.
>
> It needs something more - it's not really a finished scene - something
> like hanging gardens or some kites or ... ideas would be appreciated :-)
>
> Bye for now,
> Mike Andrews.
>
--
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
What about some guy/woman holding on at the bottom of a cluster? Trying not
to let go and fall down. gives the viewer an uhoh-feeling...... :p
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I like it already!!
Keep up the good work.
Regards,
Hugo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Andy Cocker wrote:
> I really like this image. It is very 'Gilles' though...;-)
>
Thanks, higher praise I couldn't hope for :-)
I did try to get a 'Tranesque' feel to the picture and used techniques
picked up from him ...
> All the best,
>
> Andy Cocker
>
Mike Andrews.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Philippe Debar wrote:
> A plane looking like a inverted submarine ?
>
Hmm, it is rather similar to the 'Abyss' scene isn't it? It sort of
evolved this way ... I'll have to add something to change the feel.
Mike Andrews.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
