POV-Ray: Newsgroups: povray.binaries.images: Dagnabbit

POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Dagnabbit		Server Time 16 Nov 2024 04:22:26 EST (-0500)

From: Timothy R Cook
Subject: Dagnabbit
Date: 8 Mar 2003 20:13:29
Message: <3e6a9539$1@news.povray.org>

These glass objects that occupy 100 square pixels are taking several
minutes per pixel...should I kill my now 2+ day render, put those
glass objects into no_image, and make duplicates that are quicker
to render that have pass_through and no_shadow and all that?

-- 
Tim Cook
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-empyrean

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Post a reply to this message

From: St
Subject: Re: Dagnabbit
Date: 8 Mar 2003 22:03:49
Message: <3e6aaf15$1@news.povray.org>

"Timothy R. Cook" <z993126bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:3e6a9539$1@news.povray.org...
> These glass objects that occupy 100 square pixels are taking several
> minutes per pixel...should I kill my now 2+ day render, put those
> glass objects into no_image, and make duplicates that are quicker
> to render that have pass_through and no_shadow and all that?

   YES, let's see the piccy at 640*480 - ANYTHING!   Please Tim...

   ~Steve~


>
> --
> Tim Cook
> http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-empyrean
>
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> Version: 3.12
> GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
> N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
> PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
> D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
>

Post a reply to this message

From: Rick [Kitty5]
Subject: Re: Dagnabbit
Date: 9 Mar 2003 09:49:21
Message: <3e6b5471@news.povray.org>

Timothy R. Cook wrote:
> These glass objects that occupy 100 square pixels are taking several
> minutes per pixel...should I kill my now 2+ day render, put those
> glass objects into no_image, and make duplicates that are quicker
> to render that have pass_through and no_shadow and all that?

Depends if pixels its done already look good, I would be tempted to let it
run


--
Rick

Kitty5 NewMedia http://Kitty5.co.uk
POV-Ray News & Resources http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037

PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA

Post a reply to this message

From: Timothy R Cook
Subject: Re: Dagnabbit
Date: 9 Mar 2003 12:55:40
Message: <3e6b801c$1@news.povray.org>

Rick [Kitty5] wrote:
> Depends if pixels its done already look good, I would be tempted to let it
> run

They didn't, not enough to be worth the time they were taking.

-- 
Tim Cook
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-empyrean

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Post a reply to this message