 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
the clouds at the moment are from skies.inc, so they'll be replaced
(hopefully) with some v. nice media wotsits, but how does it look so far?
thanks
jim
www.jimbobjim.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'landscape.jpg' (27 KB)
Preview of image 'landscape.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"James Taylor" <jim### [at] blueyonder couk> wrote in message
news:3e56ae16@news.povray.org...
| but how does it look so far?
Needs mineral deposits on the rocks at the waterline, bad. Also scum
beneath the waterline. Otherwise, nice.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Superb, but sky is falling a bit into the ground. The foreground says, "I'm
going to be a successful zazzle image as soon as the sky and background are
brought up to my level of quality."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
3e56ae16@news.povray.org...
> the clouds at the moment are from skies.inc, so they'll be replaced
> (hopefully) with some v. nice media wotsits, but how does it look so far?
Like a winner; very beautiful image.
Waiting to see the new sky (and the OT)
Bye. Good luck.
Txemi Jendrix
http://www.txemijendrix.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Like a winner; very beautiful image.
> Waiting to see the new sky (and the OT)
Thanks Txemi, whats the OT though?
jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Thanks Txemi, whats the OT though?
Gah, OT = old technology
the rocks are meant to be a stone circle, so it's *really* old technolgy. Is
this something that you you see just from looking at the image or do you
think I should make a little more obvious?
cheers
jim
--
"No, you don't understand - I've got the keys the gates of paradise,
but I've got too many legs" -- Geoff
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Needs mineral deposits on the rocks at the waterline, bad. Also scum
> beneath the waterline.
I'll add that to my to-do list, I suspect a gradient y and turbulence will
do the trick.
>Otherwise, nice.
Thanks Shay.
jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Greg M. Johnson" <gregj:-)56590@ao:-)l.com> wrote in message
news:3e56fe38$1@news.povray.org...
> Superb, but sky is falling a bit into the ground. The foreground says,
"I'm
> going to be a successful zazzle image as soon as the sky and background
are
> brought up to my level of quality."
>
Ooooh Zazzle there's an idea ;)
at the moment the image represents a few hours work a - few more on Tuesday
(my day off) should bring everthing else up to speed.
jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
3e591ca6$1@news.povray.org...
> Gah, OT = old technology
Yes, that's what I meant.
> the rocks are meant to be a stone circle, so it's *really* old technolgy.
Is
> this something that you you see just from looking at the image or do you
> think I should make a little more obvious?
It's obvious the rocks are meant to be a stone circle.
Sorry, maybe I've been so involved in machine design for my entry.
Again, beautiful image.
Bye
Txemi Jendrix
http://www.txemijendrix.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Pardon my trans-finite stupidity, but... what is "zazzle"???
Andrew.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
