Same as before... more photons / different lighting.

Best,

    S.

--
Steven Pigeon, Ph. D.
pig### [at] iroumontrealca

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'sparkly.jpg' (54 KB)

Preview of image 'sparkly.jpg'

Steven Pigeon wrote:

> 
> Same as before... more photons / different lighting.
> 
> Best,
> 
>     S.
> 
> --
> Steven Pigeon, Ph. D.
> pig### [at] iroumontrealca


How long did it take you? I'm doing the some thing at
180x1024 for a cool background and a PIII600 and so far
I'm at line 762 @ the 69th hour :( What takes more cpu time? 
The radiosity, photons, or antie-aliasing (default setting)?
--Christopher

Post a reply to this message

"Steven Pigeon" <pig### [at] iroumontrealca> wrote in message
news:3e4c405f@news.povray.org...
>
> Same as before... more photons / different lighting.
>
Verrry interesting! ....and on Valentine's Day as well. Who you gonna give
'em to, Steve?

:-))

John
--
Run Fast
Run Free
Run Linux

Post a reply to this message

Reminds me of smokey quartz.  Very nice!

"Steven Pigeon" <pig### [at] iroumontrealca> wrote in message
news:3e4c405f@news.povray.org...
>
> Same as before... more photons / different lighting.
>
> Best,
>
>     S.
>
> --
> Steven Pigeon, Ph. D.
> pig### [at] iroumontrealca
>
>
>

Post a reply to this message

First, it's not Steve, but Steven.

And, yes, I can post source in ...scene-file.
There's little change relative to the previous
one.

Best,

    S.


--
Steven Pigeon, Ph. D.
pig### [at] iroumontrealca
"Doctor John" <jgu### [at] netscapenet> wrote in message
news:3e4cfa4b$1@news.povray.org...
> "Steven Pigeon" <pig### [at] iroumontrealca> wrote in message
> news:3e4c405f@news.povray.org...
> >
> > Same as before... more photons / different lighting.
> >
> Verrry interesting! ....and on Valentine's Day as well. Who you gonna give
> 'em to, Steve?
>
> :-))
>
> John
> --
> Run Fast
> Run Free
> Run Linux
>
>

Post a reply to this message

"Christopher Endsley" <end### [at] yokutscsustanedu> wrote in message
news:3e4c80d9@news.povray.org...
> How long did it take you? I'm doing the some thing at
> 180x1024 for a cool background and a PIII600 and so far
> I'm at line 762 @ the 69th hour :( What takes more cpu time?
> The radiosity, photons, or antie-aliasing (default setting)?
> --Christopher

Well, I did render it in 1280x768 (and reduced it to 66% to
post) and it took little over 20 h, I would guess. I have a 1.7Gh
Athlon with 512 megs of ram. I'm not sure how long it took exactly,
because the computer was in hybernation for the night.


Best,

    S.

Post a reply to this message