 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
others.
May be Kruger liked the cross section of #1 better than #5's...
What's your choice.
After the survey, the constest : will you guess which tool I used to design
these blades (not spatch, or anything like that) ?
Thanks again
Philippe
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Blades 2 the sequel.jpg' (16 KB)
Preview of image 'Blades 2 the sequel.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
3e4c8576@news.povray.org...
> After the survey, the constest : will you guess which tool I used to
design
> these blades (not spatch, or anything like that) ?
>
A sweeped and scaled (scale following a spline) prism along a vector?
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
They are all very medieval :)
2,5, 6 are my favorite.
Best,
S.
--
Steven Pigeon, Ph. D.
pig### [at] iro umontrealca
"Philippe_Gibone" <Ph.### [at] wanadoofr> wrote in message
news:3e4c8576@news.povray.org...
> others.
> May be Kruger liked the cross section of #1 better than #5's...
> What's your choice.
>
> After the survey, the constest : will you guess which tool I used to
design
> these blades (not spatch, or anything like that) ?
>
> Thanks again
> Philippe
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nope !
I won't retain the truth, any longer, I used Domenator, a plugin for Moray
(and a generator for povray), which I design to model the many different
Domes I saw in Moscow, that another ray tracer used for a paper basket, and
that I thaught could do blades only in playing with the scaling, in fact I
was surprised myself with the result.
Philippe
3e4ce872@news.povray.org...
>
> 3e4c8576@news.povray.org...
> > After the survey, the constest : will you guess which tool I used to
> design
> > these blades (not spatch, or anything like that) ?
> >
> A sweeped and scaled (scale following a spline) prism along a vector?
> Marc
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From this choice, I prefer #2. I read the other comments from the last one,
and the rounded tip is probably more historically accurate. It was just a
preference.
As far as how...I have no idea. They all look very well done.
Kruger
"Philippe_Gibone" <Ph.### [at] wanadoofr> wrote in message
news:3e4c8576@news.povray.org...
> others.
> May be Kruger liked the cross section of #1 better than #5's...
> What's your choice.
>
> After the survey, the constest : will you guess which tool I used to
design
> these blades (not spatch, or anything like that) ?
>
> Thanks again
> Philippe
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I like #5 and #7, but the cross section shouldn't extend all the way to the tip
of the blade... that is, if you can help it. if not, they are perfect.
-Law
Philippe_Gibone wrote:
> others.
> May be Kruger liked the cross section of #1 better than #5's...
> What's your choice.
>
> After the survey, the constest : will you guess which tool I used to design
> these blades (not spatch, or anything like that) ?
>
> Thanks again
> Philippe
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks for your Help.
>but the cross section shouldn't extend all the way to the tip of the
blade...
You're definitely right, but I made this little study because I had that
silly idea that a blade is nothing else than a dome squizzed in one
direction and elongated in another one, so it went out not so bad and with
very few efforts, and working more on it would mean a lot of work that my
wife is not prepared to support ;-).
Thanks again
Philippe
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
