From: Mike Williams
Subject: pots improved
Date: 20 Jan 2003 11:17:12
Message: <3e2c2108@news.povray.org>
I worked on the fire and I am dealing with ideas for the background. Thought
about a logcabin but that seemed out of place. It is indian art so an adobe
building might work. Even a tepe but I am now leaning towards a patio scene
so I can keep the stars visiable. I would also put the flame on a torch
moving it out of the cup. Should light the scene better anyway. I have two
lights now, might add more.
Thoughts?
"Mike Williams" <mic### [at] quixnetnet> wrote in
news:3e2c2108@news.povray.org:
> I worked on the fire and I am dealing with ideas for the background.> Thought about a logcabin but that seemed out of place. It is indian> art so an adobe building might work. Even a tepe but I am now leaning> towards a patio scene so I can keep the stars visiable. I would also> put the flame on a torch moving it out of the cup. Should light the> scene better anyway. I have two lights now, might add more.> > Thoughts?
With that much light in the foreground, the stars wouldn't be visible. Of
course, that doesn't mean it's not a cool effect. <smile>
--
Rich Allen
(Remove SPAM from my address to reply by e-mail)
From: Andrew Coppin
Subject: Re: pots improved
Date: 21 Jan 2003 14:26:40
Message: <3e2d9ef0@news.povray.org>
Didn't see the original, but I like this "improved" version. It's a very
nice image. I've often thought about trying to do a scene with fire, but I
never thought I'd get it to work right... Yours actually looks rather good -
as does the whole scene really. Nice one!
Andrew.