|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
A church that existed but never was build.
Txemi Jendrix
http://www.txemijendrix.com
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'church01.jpg' (31 KB)
Preview of image 'church01.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Red & White version
Txemi Jendrix
http://www.txemijendrix.com
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'church01RW.jpg' (61 KB)
Preview of image 'church01RW.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This one with color is vivid, adds a lot to the model compared with all
grays. I guess that's a testament to what texturing is all about. ;-)
I don't see any way for people to get into the place, seems to be missing
steps. And I must ask this... the arcs of the central dome aren't evenly
spaced. Was that intentional?
Also, while I was looking it over I realized that the ground where the
corners are at happens to be brighter than along the walls. Just the
opposite of what I'd expect. I don't know how it should look. I'd need to
check outside in the daytime on a cloudy day.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Also, while I was looking it over I realized that the ground where the
> corners are at happens to be brighter than along the walls. Just the
> opposite of what I'd expect. I don't know how it should look. I'd need to
> check outside in the daytime on a cloudy day.
It's exactly what I would expect if the walls just reflect a little bit of
light.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It needs something else to give a sense of scale. To me it looks like a
model of a church that's about two feet across.
Although you probably had already planned that.
Oh yeah, and like another guy said. Where's the entrance?
-DJ
Txemi Jendrix wrote:
> A church that existed but never was build.
>
> Txemi Jendrix
> http://www.txemijendrix.com
>
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
DJ Wiza <Kil### [at] sohcahtoanet> wrote in
news:3e228db2@news.povray.org
> It needs something else to give a sense of scale. To me it looks like a
> model of a church that's about two feet across.
Maybe some trees?
--
#macro g(U,V)(.4*abs(sin(9*sqrt(pow(x-U,2)+pow(y-V,2))))*pow(1-min(1,(sqrt(
pow(x-U,2)+pow(y-V,2))*.3)),2)+.9)#end#macro p(c)#if(c>1)#local l=mod(c,100
);g(2*div(l,10)-8,2*mod(l,10)-8)*p(div(c,100))#else 1#end#end light_source{
y 2}sphere{z*20 9pigment{function{p(26252423)*p(36455644)*p(66656463)}}}//M
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
To answer all:
The church is a Leonardo Da Vinci's project.
It pretends to be a scale model of the church for a scene
I'm planing to do for the IRTC.
Model is not an exact copy. It has some differences from
the original.
Da Vinci link is at (italian only):
www.museoscienza.org\leonardo\chiesapiantacentrale.html
Any suggestion is welcome.
Other answers:
Hughes,b:
> the arcs of the central dome aren't evenly spaced. Was that intentional?
Yes, look at the original model.
> Also, while I was looking it over I realized that the ground where the
> corners are at happens to be brighter than along the walls.
Must be a radiosity effect.
DJ Wiza:
> It needs something else to give a sense of scale. To me it looks like a
> model of a church that's about two feet across.
> Although you probably had already planned that.
As it's a scale model, maybe I have obtained the desired effect ;-)
> Oh yeah, and like another guy said. Where's the entrance?
There are four entrances in the bottom of the little front towers.
(the red differenced box)
Maybe I shoud define it a little bit more.
Rafal 'Raf256' Maj:
> Maybe some trees?
Maybe some machines ;-)
Thank you all for your comments.
Bye
Txemi Jendrix
http://www.txemijendrix.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 02:39:39 +0100, Txemi Jendrix wrote:
> A church that existed but never was build.
>
Nice modelling. I prefer the all gray version.
--
%HAV-A-NICEDAY email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
Steve web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
6:25pm up 22 days, 18:44, 1 user, load average: 1.09, 1.09, 1.09
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |