POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : it's HDRI-tiiimee :) Server Time
16 Nov 2024 16:13:32 EST (-0500)
  it's HDRI-tiiimee :) (Message 1 to 10 of 14)  
Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 4 Messages >>>
From: Zeger Knaepen
Subject: it's HDRI-tiiimee :)
Date: 27 Dec 2002 22:43:26
Message: <3e0d1dde@news.povray.org>
Just a slightly adjusted version of the demo-scene included with MLPov.
First image is the POV-Ray-version, second image is a post-processed
version.

Here are some more tests: http://sad.studentenweb.org/hdri/

cu!
--
ZK AKA SaD
http://www.povplace.be.tf
"Wake up! Time to die."


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'HDRI2.jpg' (16 KB) Download 'HDRI2pp.jpg' (26 KB)

Preview of image 'HDRI2.jpg'
HDRI2.jpg

Preview of image 'HDRI2pp.jpg'
HDRI2pp.jpg


 

From: JPGargoyle
Subject: Re: it's HDRI-tiiimee :)
Date: 27 Dec 2002 22:57:55
Message: <3e0d2143@news.povray.org>
This sure looks promissing :)

Pretty cool stuff.

Can you tell something about render times?

Best regards.


Post a reply to this message

From: Zeger Knaepen
Subject: Re: it's HDRI-tiiimee :)
Date: 27 Dec 2002 23:03:50
Message: <3e0d22a6@news.povray.org>
"JPGargoyle" <jot### [at] netcabopt> schreef in bericht
news:3e0d2143@news.povray.org...
> This sure looks promissing :)
>
> Pretty cool stuff.
tnx :)

> Can you tell something about render times?
It was rendered in 2 passes.  First pass with high radiosity settings
(error_bound .01 and 600 samples) at a very low resolution (160*120) (I
don't remember the rendertime for the first pass), second pass with lower
radiosity settings (error_bound 1.01, still 600 samples) at the full
resolution.  The second pass took 11 minutes 39 seconds, on an AMD
Thunderbird 1.1GHz, 352MB RAM, running Windows Me (too lazy to install a
decent OS :)

cu!
--
ZK AKA SaD
http://www.povplace.be.tf
"Trust is only dangerous when you have to rely on it."


Post a reply to this message

From: Daniel Matthews
Subject: Re: it's HDRI-tiiimee :)
Date: 27 Dec 2002 23:53:34
Message: <1734054.elrD77ACJf@3-e.net>
Can you do this one again but add photons?
http://sad.studentenweb.org/hdri/globalilluminationtest7.jpg


Post a reply to this message

From: The Mad Hatter
Subject: Re: it's HDRI-tiiimee :)
Date: 28 Dec 2002 00:35:02
Message: <web.3e0d37d0f814632c5798b2cc0@news.povray.org>
I love it when a plan comes together....


*** http://www.highpoly3d.com ***
*** Tutorials/Textures/Forums ***


Post a reply to this message

From: Zeger Knaepen
Subject: Re: it's HDRI-tiiimee :)
Date: 28 Dec 2002 08:44:23
Message: <3e0daab7@news.povray.org>
"Daniel Matthews" <dan#@3-e.net> schreef in bericht
news:173### [at] 3-enet...
> Can you do this one again but add photons?
> http://sad.studentenweb.org/hdri/globalilluminationtest7.jpg

there are no light_source's, so how can I add photons?

cu!
--
ZK AKA SaD
http://www.povplace.be.tf
"Why make trillions when we could make... billions?"


Post a reply to this message

From: Daniel Matthews
Subject: Re: it's HDRI-tiiimee :)
Date: 28 Dec 2002 16:10:52
Message: <1236264.W7W56anrVo@3-e.net>
Zeger Knaepen wrote:

> "Daniel Matthews" <dan#@3-e.net> schreef in bericht
> news:173### [at] 3-enet...
>> Can you do this one again but add photons?
>> http://sad.studentenweb.org/hdri/globalilluminationtest7.jpg
> 
> there are no light_source's, so how can I add photons?

Ah well there's a nasty problem, if the HDRI environment can't act as a
light source for the purpose of generating caustics etc. then it is useless
for creating photo-realistic images.
<sigh>

-- 
Your connection failed because: Zombie processes haunting the computer


Post a reply to this message

From: Zeger Knaepen
Subject: Re: it's HDRI-tiiimee :)
Date: 28 Dec 2002 16:31:35
Message: <3e0e1837$1@news.povray.org>
> Ah well there's a nasty problem, if the HDRI environment can't act as a
> light source for the purpose of generating caustics etc. then it is
useless
> for creating photo-realistic images.
> <sigh>

but if the radiosity-algorithm takes ior's into account, high enough
radiosity-settings should produce accurate caustics, no?

cu!
--
ZK AKA SaD
http://www.povplace.be.tf
"Don't torture yourself Gomez, that's my job."


Post a reply to this message

From: Slime
Subject: Re: it's HDRI-tiiimee :)
Date: 28 Dec 2002 21:43:37
Message: <3e0e6159$1@news.povray.org>
> but if the radiosity-algorithm takes ior's into account, high enough
> radiosity-settings should produce accurate caustics, no?


Correct.

 - Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]


Post a reply to this message

From: Zeger Knaepen
Subject: Re: it's HDRI-tiiimee :)
Date: 28 Dec 2002 22:01:13
Message: <3e0e6579$1@news.povray.org>
"Slime" <slm### [at] slimelandcom> schreef in bericht
news:3e0e6159$1@news.povray.org...
> > but if the radiosity-algorithm takes ior's into account, high enough
> > radiosity-settings should produce accurate caustics, no?
> Correct.

but does it take IOR's and reflections into account?

cu!
--
ZK AKA SaD
http://www.povplace.be.tf
"We're not getting out of here in one piece, or if we do, it'll be one big
flat piece."


Post a reply to this message

Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 4 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.