 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I was bored, and since I needed a new wallpaper I began experimenting
with blobs. This is the result of about one hour of "work". I don't know
what this "thing" is, but it surely looks creepy.
The texture is something I'm quite satisfied with, but the geometry
could need some refinement: The blob components are placed along a
random spline, and I was too lazy to add checks for self-intersection of
the "thing".
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'experiment22.jpg' (52 KB)
Preview of image 'experiment22.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Timon Christl wrote:
> I was bored, and since I needed a new wallpaper I began experimenting
> with blobs. This is the result of about one hour of "work". I don't
> know what this "thing" is, but it surely looks creepy.
>
> The texture is something I'm quite satisfied with, but the geometry
> could need some refinement: The blob components are placed along a
> random spline, and I was too lazy to add checks for self-intersection
> of the "thing".
Wow! I like it. Really Lovecraftian. :P I agree with you on the texture;
it's really disgusting. Have you ever been into Lathamian so-called Organic
Art? His algorithms with your texture added would be scary.
Regards,
Simen.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That is actually pretty dam cool. (Like the tital by the way ;-) Very
interesting...
Andrew.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Simen Kvaal wrote:
> Timon Christl wrote:
>
> >I was bored, and since I needed a new wallpaper I began experimenting
> >with blobs. This is the result of about one hour of "work". I don't
> >know what this "thing" is, but it surely looks creepy.
> >
> >The texture is something I'm quite satisfied with, but the geometry
> >could need some refinement: The blob components are placed along a
> >random spline, and I was too lazy to add checks for self-intersection
> >of the "thing".
>
>
> Wow! I like it. Really Lovecraftian. :P I agree with you on the texture;
> it's really disgusting. Have you ever been into Lathamian so-called
> Organic
> Art? His algorithms with your texture added would be scary.
No I've never heard of that, and a quick search with Google did not give
me anything useful either. Do you have a link to some website or such?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Timon Christl <me### [at] christltimon de> wrote in
news:3ddabc76$1@news.povray.org:
> Simen Kvaal wrote:
>> Wow! I like it. Really Lovecraftian. :P I agree with you on the
>> texture; it's really disgusting. Have you ever been into Lathamian
>> so-called Organic
>> Art? His algorithms with your texture added would be scary.
>
> No I've never heard of that, and a quick search with Google did not
> give me anything useful either. Do you have a link to some website or
> such?
That's because it is William Latham...
Searching organic art on Google was more effective...
http://www.artworks.co.uk/organic.htm
--
--=#=--=#=--=#=--=#=--=#=--=#=--=#=--=#=--=#=--
Philippe Lhoste (Paris -- France)
Professional programmer and amateur artist
http://jove.prohosting.com/~philho/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
