POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Left Behind (106 Kb Attachment) Server Time
17 Nov 2024 08:18:49 EST (-0500)
  Left Behind (106 Kb Attachment) (Message 1 to 8 of 8)  
From: Aaron Gillies
Subject: Left Behind (106 Kb Attachment)
Date: 14 Sep 2002 23:25:20
Message: <3d83fda0@news.povray.org>
Folks:

I have been experimenting with some of the new POV 3.5 features
and I have come up with this image.  I started out trying to get
some realistic-looking water using height_field and the bozo pattern
as an internal bitmap.  I never got a truly realistic appearance, but
I did get something attractive out of it.  I was also able to make my
first image that did not use the default aspect ratio.  This one
is 2:1 instead of 4:3.

Aaron

Aaron Gillies
New York City
x3rxes[%]yahoo.com


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'left_behind.jpg' (107 KB)

Preview of image 'left_behind.jpg'
left_behind.jpg


 

From: Tim Mcmurdo
Subject: Re: Left Behind (106 Kb Attachment)
Date: 15 Sep 2002 07:40:07
Message: <web.3d847095b2ff99049a303f820@news.povray.org>
I too have been trying to come up with ways of making realistic water. I
think you have done a great job in creating small wavelets. My suggestion
on the texture would be to give the height field a semi transparent grey
texture and then place a darker blue or green plane below it.

Tim


Post a reply to this message

From: J  Diehl
Subject: Re: Left Behind (106 Kb Attachment)
Date: 16 Sep 2002 09:45:22
Message: <web.3d85dfffb2ff9904f70c33440@news.povray.org>
Aaron Gillies wrote:
>I started out trying to get
>some realistic-looking water using height_field and the bozo pattern
>as an internal bitmap.

For more rough sea, try  inverted granite pattern at large scale. It causes
'sharper' waves.


Post a reply to this message

From: Christoph Hormann
Subject: Re: Left Behind (106 Kb Attachment)
Date: 16 Sep 2002 11:25:16
Message: <3D85F7DC.163D3C3C@gmx.de>
Aaron Gillies wrote:
> 
> Folks:
> 
> I have been experimenting with some of the new POV 3.5 features
> and I have come up with this image.  I started out trying to get
> some realistic-looking water using height_field and the bozo pattern
> as an internal bitmap.  I never got a truly realistic appearance, but
> I did get something attractive out of it.  I was also able to make my
> first image that did not use the default aspect ratio.  This one
> is 2:1 instead of 4:3.

Nice, but too bright IMO, apart from that using a heightfield for an
infinite water plane is usually not such a good idea.

Christoph

-- 
POV-Ray tutorials, IsoWood include,                 
TransSkin and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/  
Last updated 13 Aug. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______


Post a reply to this message

From: Aaron Gillies
Subject: Re: Left Behind (106 Kb Attachment)
Date: 16 Sep 2002 11:56:33
Message: <3d85ff31$1@news.povray.org>
"Christoph Hormann" <chr### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
news:3D85F7DC.163D3C3C@gmx.de...

> Nice, but too bright IMO, apart from that using a heightfield for an
> infinite water plane is usually not such a good idea.
>
> Christoph
>

Hmm ...

I was wondering.  The height_field is exactly the smallest size
necessary to give the illusion of an infinite water plane, but it is,
of course, not infinite.

Is there a better strategy?

Aaron

Aaron Gillies
New York City
x3rxes[&]yahoo.com


Post a reply to this message

From: Christoph Hormann
Subject: Re: Left Behind (106 Kb Attachment)
Date: 16 Sep 2002 12:11:07
Message: <3D86029A.605E8767@gmx.de>
Aaron Gillies wrote:
> 
> I was wondering.  The height_field is exactly the smallest size
> necessary to give the illusion of an infinite water plane, but it is,
> of course, not infinite.
> 
> Is there a better strategy?

http://www-public.tu-bs.de:8080/~y0013390/pov/water/water05.html

Christoph

-- 
POV-Ray tutorials, IsoWood include,                 
TransSkin and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/  
Last updated 13 Aug. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______


Post a reply to this message

From: Kaveh
Subject: Re: Left Behind (106 Kb Attachment)
Date: 20 Sep 2002 05:15:04
Message: <web.3d8ae6ceb2ff9904faa646640@news.povray.org>
Christoph Hormann wrote:

[...]

>Nice, but too bright IMO, apart from that using a heightfield for an
>infinite water plane is usually not such a good idea.

I took the liberty of downloading the image and "cheating" by darkening in
PhotoShop. I think it improves too. Please see:

http://homepage.mac.com/kaveh1000/FileSharing63.html

Kaveh


Post a reply to this message

From: Aaron Gillies
Subject: Re: Left Behind (106 Kb Attachment)
Date: 21 Sep 2002 16:45:59
Message: <3d8cda87$1@news.povray.org>
Hmm ...

I see what you mean.  I think that the reason it looked so bright was
because you are seeing the scene through a ground fog, which
brightened things up a bit ...

Aaron

Aaron Gillies
New York City
x3rxes[^]yahoo.com


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.