Bryan Valencia wrote:
> This started out as just a radiosity test for me to get the hang of it...
Hmmm... perhaps too complex for a "get the hang" test.
> It's taken on a life of it's own.> > Comments please.
The lighting it's a bit confusing... there is only one light?
--
Jaime Vives Piqueres
La Persistencia de la Ignorancia
http://www.ignorancia.org
There is only one light - I am not that good with media, and it's giving me
some weird effects I can't figure out.
All I wanted was for the light to be streaming in through the ceiling, but
it seems to want to make those white boxes everywhere.
Bryan wrote:
> There is only one light - I am not that good with media, and it's giving> me some weird effects I can't figure out.> > All I wanted was for the light to be streaming in through the ceiling, but> it seems to want to make those white boxes everywhere.
Ah! Yes, those boxes confused me also... I figured later that it could be
a problem with low samples/intervals. Hope this helps...
--
Jaime Vives Piqueres
La Persistencia de la Ignorancia
http://www.ignorancia.org
Bryan Valencia wrote:
> Aha! It was set to samples 2,10 - I changed it to samples> 10,100> > It's still rendering. :P
Of course... haven't you noticed at first render that it was too fast? :)
--
Jaime Vives Piqueres
La Persistencia de la Ignorancia
http://www.ignorancia.org
Now I remember why I stopped dabbling in media...
The original render was 35 minutes at 1280x1024.
Dave Dunn wrote:
> Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:>> >> Of course... haven't you noticed at first render that it was too fast? :)>> Anything under a week is suspect...
