 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi
Here's a whiter version of my bird pic. I'm curious to know which version people
prefer.
Mick
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'BirdW.jpg' (87 KB)
Preview of image 'BirdW.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Mick Hazelgrove" <mic### [at] mhazelgrove fsnetcouk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:3d5b6d52@news.povray.org...
> Hi
>
> Here's a whiter version of my bird pic. I'm curious to know which version
people prefer.
>
> Mick
>
I prefer the white verision, because ( to me ) it looks more realistic. When
I think about it, the blueish tone wasn't too realistic if you regard the
dark clouds which *should* prevent the sky's blue color from reflecting on
the surface through radiosity...however you turn it, it's a really
impressive picture.
f00
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Mick Hazelgrove" <mic### [at] mhazelgrovefsnetcouk> wrote in message
news:3d5b6d52@news.povray.org...
> Hi
>
> Here's a whiter version of my bird pic. I'm curious to know which version
people prefer.
>
This, whiter, version - the snow and ice in the previous version were a
little too blue - this version is about spot on.
--
Pandora/Scott Hill/[::O:M:C::]Scorpion
Software Engineer.
http://www.pandora-software.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I have an old version of your picture.. I think it was from April this year.
I like the simpler look of it; the more white landscape which contains more
snow, and the more winther-like sky.
I know you didn't like to hear that... You've done some impressive work with
icy ropes but the picture doesn't contain as much depth, contrast, and
clarity as the old version - in my humble opinion.. Some textures have
improved though.
Best regards,
Hugo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I like everything about this scene except the eyes. I don't have a
reference handy but I keep thinking they should be darker with larger
pupils. Of course I could be wrong, but I suggest you dig up a couple of
photos to make sure I'm wrong.
"Mick Hazelgrove" <mic### [at] mhazelgrovefsnetcouk> wrote in message
news:3d5b6d52@news.povray.org...
> Hi
>
> Here's a whiter version of my bird pic. I'm curious to know which version
people prefer.
>
> Mick
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
> Hi
>
> Here's a whiter version of my bird pic. I'm curious to know which version people
prefer.
>
This one.
--
/*Francois Labreque*/#local a=x+y;#local b=x+a;#local c=a+b;#macro P(F//
/* flabreque */L)polygon{5,F,F+z,L+z,L,F pigment{rgb 9}}#end union
/* @ */{P(0,a)P(a,b)P(b,c)P(2*a,2*b)P(2*b,b+c)P(b+c,<2,3>)
/* videotron.ca */}camera{orthographic location<6,1.25,-6>look_at a }
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3d5b6d52@news.povray.org>,
"Mick Hazelgrove" <mic### [at] mhazelgrovefsnetcouk> wrote:
> Here's a whiter version of my bird pic. I'm curious to know which version
> people prefer.
This is very nice...just a couple things:
The barbed wire looks like it is supposed to be rusty, but looks too
orange and even. I'd suggest a dark gray with areas that are closer to
the color of those tail feathers. It also looks too thick and the barbs
too long, but that could be the kind of wire.
The feathers don't seem very "fluffy" to me. It looks kind of like a
painted carving. Maybe if you could make a couple stray feathers poke
out...
I think the eyes should be more orange.
--
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Absolutely fantastic!
No criticism this, but why not try a version with a bit of focul blur to
bring out the bitd/post/wire/icicles a bit.
Top notch stuff, Mick!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
wow ... this one is great ...
looks like a painted one ... great ...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
There are some small features that could make the head of the bird more
realistic:
1. the eye looks now a bit like a fish eye, laying on the surface of the
head.
2. the "eyebrow" should be directly above the eye, without a gap.
3. the beak of the bird has a nostril. the lower part of the beak ends below
the eye.
For the little image editing, this photo was used:
http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/birdingtrails/images/eagle.jpg
This are small details, I think the bird pic looks great as it is now.
"Mick Hazelgrove" <mic### [at] mhazelgrovefsnetcouk> wrote in message
news:3d5b6d52@news.povray.org...
> Hi
>
> Here's a whiter version of my bird pic. I'm curious to know which version
people prefer.
>
> Mick
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'that_bird3.jpg' (9 KB)
Preview of image 'that_bird3.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
