 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
How about this I'm not too happy yet, have to toy around
with the colors a little more, but some comments are always
helpful, especially from people who have some more insight...
---
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Email: Tim### [at] gmx de
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Iced_Land5.jpg' (112 KB)
Preview of image 'Iced_Land5.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002 16:39:33 +0200, "Tim Nikias" <tim### [at] gmxde> wrote:
> How about this I'm not too happy yet, have to toy around
> with the colors a little more, but some comments are always
> helpful, especially from people who have some more insight...
That's beauty.
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> That's beauty.
>
> ABX
Wow... Not only a quick reply, but a very astonishing one...
I didn't think I could make it THAT fast... :-)
I'm toying around at the moment, and it seems, I'm just
to stuck with the way I've moved up till this picture, so
I'll probably just do some fine-tuning tweaks...
Thank very very much for the reply!
---
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Email: Tim### [at] gmxde
"ABX" <abx### [at] babilonorg> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:cil7lus3o60scj01cd0mt8c61sd7r0c8fk@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 9 Aug 2002 16:39:33 +0200, "Tim Nikias" <tim### [at] gmxde> wrote:
> > How about this I'm not too happy yet, have to toy around
> > with the colors a little more, but some comments are always
> > helpful, especially from people who have some more insight...
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In my opinion this is a MAJOR improvement and the image goes directly to my
personal hall of fame! It's probably further and further away from your
original idea, but these colors are beautiful. The iglo makes more sense
now, and is clearer. The sky and sun is great.
It's not exactly like anything I've seen before. The mountains doesn't look
like typical icebergs. Nothing is flat either, as I imagine large flat areas
from the poles. Though I don't have reference pictures right here.
I would keep this setup in the records, in any case.. I don't know how to
make it more 'lonely' if that's still important. Maybe some snow, blowing in
the foreground but that's a major project as well.
Regards,
Hugo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Much better!
--josh
"Tim Nikias" <tim### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
news:3d53d3fa@news.povray.org...
> How about this I'm not too happy yet, have to toy around
> with the colors a little more, but some comments are always
> helpful, especially from people who have some more insight...
>
>
>
> ---
> Tim Nikias
> Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
> Email: Tim### [at] gmxde
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tim Nikias wrote:
> How about this I'm not too happy yet, have to toy around
> with the colors a little more, but some comments are always
> helpful, especially from people who have some more insight...
>
Just gorgeous!
The media, and the lighting look perfect. However, I don't think polar
regions get these kinds of clouds very often as they are usually
associated with warm humid weather.
I also think the little hills should be smaller, i.e. just snowbanks.
Add a distant mountain range in the background to one side, and a flat
expanse of frozen sea to the other, and you have the perfect pic, imho.
>
>
> ---
> Tim Nikias
> Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
> Email: Tim### [at] gmxde
>
>
>
--
/*Francois Labreque*/#local a=x+y;#local b=x+a;#local c=a+b;#macro P(F//
/* flabreque */L)polygon{5,F,F+z,L+z,L,F pigment{rgb 9}}#end union
/* @ */{P(0,a)P(a,b)P(b,c)P(2*a,2*b)P(2*b,b+c)P(b+c,<2,3>)
/* videotron.ca */}camera{orthographic location<6,1.25,-6>look_at a }
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Just gorgeous!
Thank you very much!
Regarding the clouds: I kinda like them, and, though its
probably very rare that they occur there, its just rare, not
impossible... :-) (Just trying to argument why I wanna keep
them...)
Regarding the mountains and the ocean...
Nice idea, problem is, the scene has developed far
from what it was meant to be, so the script isn't
really supportive for distant mountain ranges or
a water-plane... I fiddling about to an extent where
I *know* that the mountains are just faked in size
and the water is actually just a box...
Nah. That's not my style. But perhaps someone else
will try, using isosurfaces for the landscape (cause I think
they are more suited for jaggy icerocks...)
---
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Email: Tim### [at] gmxde
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thank you!
---
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Email: Tim### [at] gmxde
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Well, the loneliness topic for this image was lost a
loooong time ago, not that it matters when the image
is nice...
As for the landscape: many have said it wasn't very
realistic, but perhaps I'll try your idea of making them less
high. I'll see, but I'm pretty content with it right now...
Finally. ;-)
---
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Email: Tim### [at] gmxde
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Very col pic, but the snow and ice should be much brighter, unless of course
you are keeping it dark for a reason. Even in twilight the snow should look
pretty white. I love your landscape, though
--
"I felt a great disturbance in the Force . . . as if millions of Star Trek
lovers suddenly cried out in terror and Kirk was somehow silenced. I fear
something terribly good has happened."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
