 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
So I got the urge to do some matrixey text yesterday. This took 1 hour and a
half to render on my 1.33GHz AMD Athlon c. I did a little post-processing in
Photoshop to add the glow and the "POV-Trix" text in front. Enjoy.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'ab_matrix.jpg' (112 KB)
Preview of image 'ab_matrix.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tony[B]" wrote:
> So I got the urge to do some matrixey text yesterday. This took 1 hour and a
> half to render on my 1.33GHz AMD Athlon c. I did a little post-processing in
> Photoshop to add the glow and the "POV-Trix" text in front. Enjoy.
"Unfortunately noone can be told what the POV-TRIX is..."
Damn nice, it goes for an *evocative* wallpaper.
--
Jonathan.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> "Unfortunately no one can be told what the POV-TRIX is..."
Hehe
> Damn nice, it goes for an *evocative* wallpaper.
Thanks. By the way, the 1.5h render time is for the 1080x1600 version of
this.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Are the letters placed in 3D space at different distances? I'd *love* to see
an animation of the camera moving around in them as they fall.
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Are the letters placed in 3D space at different distances?
Yes, they are. Doing it any other way would overly complicate things.
> I'd *love* to see an animation of the
> camera moving around in them as they fall.
I still haven't worked out how to animate them, but when I do, I'll gladly
oblige you.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Source please? (/me begs)
Awesome!
Tony[B] wrote:
> So I got the urge to do some matrixey text yesterday. This took 1 hour and a
> half to render on my 1.33GHz AMD Athlon c. I did a little post-processing in
> Photoshop to add the glow and the "POV-Trix" text in front. Enjoy.
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Source please? (/me begs)
As soon as I figure out how to animate it, I'll post the source.
> Awesome!
Thanks.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002 22:49:26 +0200, "JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
>"Unfortunately noone can be told what the POV-TRIX is..."
Perhaps it's more like this:
Unfortunately, no one can be told the source code of the POV-TRIX...
Later,
Glen
7no### [at] ezwvcom (Remove the numeral "7")
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Glen Berry wrote:
> Unfortunately, no one can be told the source code of the POV-TRIX...
Hah, I've been working with POV so long, when I look at a scene, I
don't see the scene, I see code!
...ok, not really.
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.scifi-fantasy.com
mirror: http://personal.lig.bellsouth.net/lig/z/9/z993126
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Hah, I've been working with POV so long, when I look at a scene, I
> don't see the scene, I see code!
Isn't that quote supposed to be the other way around? That he didn't see
code, he saw "blond, brunette, redhead"?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
