 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
These are renders(originals are 1600x1200) of an old scene I just got
re-interested in... Can anyone find anything wrong with them? Comments
will be appreciated. Thanks.
Also, source is available on request... but of course, the image maps are
way too big to send.
Loonsbury
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'EarthAfrica.jpg' (26 KB)
Download 'EarthAmericas.jpg' (29 KB)
Download 'EarthAustralia.jpg' (21 KB)
Preview of image 'EarthAfrica.jpg'
Preview of image 'EarthAmericas.jpg'
Preview of image 'EarthAustralia.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nice planet renders! Did you use scattering media for the atmosphere?
Ben Lauritzen wrote:
> These are renders(originals are 1600x1200) of an old scene I just got
> re-interested in... Can anyone find anything wrong with them? Comments
> will be appreciated. Thanks.
>
> Also, source is available on request... but of course, the image maps are
> way too big to send.
>
> Loonsbury
>
>
>
--
Samuel Benge
sbe### [at] caltel com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The blue glow around it is a little unrealistic. Is the atmosphere really
that high?
Is the moon the right distance and size?
Other than that, it's very realistic.
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Nice planet renders! Did you use scattering media for the atmosphere?
>
Yep(sorry about the e-mail reply... oops :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> The blue glow around it is a little unrealistic. Is the atmosphere really
> that high?
>
Not really...
> Is the moon the right distance and size?
>
I actually think I set it correctly in relation to the earth.
> Other than that, it's very realistic.
>
Thanks
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> > The blue glow around it is a little unrealistic. Is the atmosphere
really
> > that high?
> Not really...
Yeah, the blueness of that doesn't really look realistic. If you want the
glow, maybe you should make it closer to white than blue. Up to you.
> > Is the moon the right distance and size?
> I actually think I set it correctly in relation to the earth.
Ah, ok.
One other thing - have you fiddled with the brilliance value? I think it
might look better with a lower brilliance (to make it lighter). Maybe you've
already done this, it's hard to tell. Same for the moon.
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Yeah, the blueness of that doesn't really look realistic. If you want the
> glow, maybe you should make it closer to white than blue. Up to you.
>
> Ah, ok.
>
> One other thing - have you fiddled with the brilliance value? I think it
> might look better with a lower brilliance (to make it lighter). Maybe
you've
> already done this, it's hard to tell. Same for the moon.
>
Ahhh... I was wondering how to do that... excellent! stark light-dark
difference finally. thanks
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
'Tis happened many a times!
Ben Lauritzen wrote:
>>Nice planet renders! Did you use scattering media for the atmosphere?
>>
>>
>
> Yep(sorry about the e-mail reply... oops :)
>
>
>
--
Samuel Benge
sbe### [at] caltelcom
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Lowered brilliance value, dimmed atmosphere, moved moon(wasn't right after
all)
Look good?
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'EarthAustralia.jpg' (43 KB)
Preview of image 'EarthAustralia.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ben Lauritzen wrote:
> Lowered brilliance value, dimmed atmosphere, moved moon(wasn't right
> after all)
>
> Look good?
It looks good, but it doesn't match images from the Shuttles. Watch the
NASA channel and you'll see what I mean.
Grim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
