 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi,
I was interested in the benchmark scene, so I did a render with 1152x864
resolution.
Because of the big format I kicked the quality somewhat higher:
radiosity: count 300 (was 80)
recursion_limit 3 (was 1)
photons: spacing 0.002 (was 0.007)
It took my PIII 450 MHz 44h 32m in the background. In the beginning (first
30%)
SETI was running too!
If anyone is interested, the PNG is much better, but it is 1.48 MB.
I don't know if it is possible to attach such a big file, but I can always
try it.
Greetings,
Jaap Frank
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'benchmark_jjf15.jpg' (72 KB)
Preview of image 'benchmark_jjf15.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jaap Frank wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was interested in the benchmark scene, so I did a render with 1152x864
> resolution.
> [...]
You dare to cut off my scene? ;-)
There is something wrong with the photons, they don't show up where they
should (i.e. in the metal ring)
Otherwise it looks good.
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, IsoWood include,
TransSkin and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 15 Jul. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: "Christoph Hormann" <chr### [at] gmx de>:
> Jaap Frank wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was interested in the benchmark scene, so I did a render with 1152x864
> > resolution.
> > [...]
>
> You dare to cut off my scene? ;-)
Sorry for that, but a very small render gave the impression that it just
fitted.
I started late in the evening and the following morning I saw the missing
top.
I good not bring myself to start again.
> There is something wrong with the photons, they don't show up where they
> should (i.e. in the metal ring)
I haven't played with photons much yet, but I expected more from it either.
Maybe the settings are not optimal or the pass_through doesn't work good?
All I changed was the photon_spacing from 0.007 to 0.002.
Any hints about that (for a correct render WITH top)?
> Otherwise it looks good.
Thanks,
Greetings,
Jaap Frank
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jaap Frank wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> I haven't played with photons much yet, but I expected more from it either.
> Maybe the settings are not optimal or the pass_through doesn't work good?
> All I changed was the photon_spacing from 0.007 to 0.002.
> Any hints about that (for a correct render WITH top)?
Make sure you use version 1.02 of the benchmark scene, some earlier
version had the 'pass_through' missing for the clouds.
Last time i checked the scene photons worked. You should see the effect
quite clearly inside the metal ring.
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, IsoWood include,
TransSkin and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 15 Jul. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jaap Frank" <jjf### [at] xs4allnl> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was interested in the benchmark scene, so I did a render with
> 1152x864 resolution.
Ohh - all this beauty rendered to nothing for thousends times...
cukk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"KalleK" <kal### [at] gmxde> wrote in message news:3d39bb69@news.povray.org...
> "Jaap Frank" <jjf### [at] xs4allnl> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was interested in the benchmark scene, so I did a render with
> > 1152x864 resolution.
>
> Ohh - all this beauty rendered to nothing for thousends times...
>
> cukk
>
In approximately an hour the correct render with photons and the top of
the 'flask' is ready. It took nearly 3 days crawling over the pixels!
Jaap Frank
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
