From: Samuel Benge
Subject: Re: Clay Pot (distorted.jpg 82.5k)
Date: 27 May 2002 19:24:21
Message: <3CF2C4B3.60903@caltel.com>
Xplo Eristotle wrote:
> Samuel Benge wrote:> What do you mean, "cooked up this afternoon"? How could you make this in> an afternoon!?
By not eating and ignoring the back pain.
~Sam Benge
From: Samuel Benge
Subject: Re: Clay Pot (distorted.jpg 82.5k)
Date: 27 May 2002 19:25:38
Message: <3CF2C501.6000708@caltel.com>
Christoph Hormann wrote:
> I recognize some graininess i remember from previous scenes from you. I> guess you are using multiple area lights for lighting?
Good guess, yes. There's no way I'm going to mix radiosity and
isosurfaces together!
~Sam Benge
From: Samuel Benge
Subject: Re: Clay Pot (distorted.jpg 82.5k)
Date: 27 May 2002 19:26:55
Message: <3CF2C54E.9030505@caltel.com>
Jari Juslin wrote:
> Way cool! Especially lighting is very realistic, and there is a nice> dynamic feeling. On the other hand, I do not like the wall so much.
Which part of the wall? I was unhappy with the sharp edges and strange normal on the
wall parts which stick out.
~Sam Benge
From: Samuel Benge
Subject: Re: Clay Pot (distorted.jpg 82.5k)
Date: 27 May 2002 19:32:25
Message: <3CF2C698.3080305@caltel.com>
Oh, and the leaf blades are simply spheres that have been clipped by
very long, triangular prisms.
Samuel Benge wrote:
> >> Is the pot an isosurface? If it isn't, could it be done so? And how >> are the>> plants done?> > > Yes, the pot an isosurface. The scene started as an exercise in > distorting functions.> > ~Sam Benge>