 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Just wondering if we have reached a saturation point. Is it possible
to improve on this without using a camara?
--Blane
P.S.
I'm in for it now, huh?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'povsat.jpg' (189 KB)
Preview of image 'povsat.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Just wondering if we have reached a saturation point. Is it possible
> to improve on this without using a camara?
You mean the quality of the rendering? Hard to say I don't wonder into too
many refractive spheres on infinite checkered planes while wondering through
the fog with my camera, so I can't really say how much more realistic this
can get. Frankly if I encountered such a scene in real life my first thought
would be YKYBRTLW.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
-Hail
It is always possible to improve since nothing is perfect. My first
suggestion to you would be to make the glass surface a littl more realistic
rather than having a large round highlight.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
HA HA that was funny T. I always love it when people post jokes that
only you and maybe one other person understand. Let's see if you can
decrypt this one...FYAYMAMA2
Cheers!
On Sat, 4 May 2002 18:49:30 -0700, "Thomas Lake"
<tla### [at] REMOVE-THISshaw ca> wrote:
>> Just wondering if we have reached a saturation point. Is it possible
>> to improve on this without using a camara?
>
>You mean the quality of the rendering? Hard to say I don't wonder into too
>many refractive spheres on infinite checkered planes while wondering through
>the fog with my camera, so I can't really say how much more realistic this
>can get. Frankly if I encountered such a scene in real life my first thought
>would be YKYBRTLW.
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
bla### [at] bizzarocreationscom (Blane Bizzaro) wrote in
news:3cd4bfc7.179117284@news.povray.org:
> HA HA that was funny T. I always love it when people post jokes that
> only you and maybe one other person understand. Let's see if you can
> decrypt this one...FYAYMAMA2
*plonk*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That finish that you've used looks like a really good baloon texture,
looks like it's going to go BANG - and it's too close to my face:-)
--
sphere{z*5,1pigment{rgb.5}finish{reflection.3specular.5}}box{<-50,-3,-50>
<50,-2,50>pigment{checker/*\__\\__/ * \_\\__*/scale 2}finish{ambient.7}}
light_source/*__\\__\\__\\__\\__\( ~ )\__\\__\\__\\__\\*/{<2,5,1>*4,1}
/*\\__\\__\\__\\__\\__\\__\\__\\__\~ -/__\\__\\__\\__\\__\\*//* Steve */
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>FYAYMAMA2
Try not to be so sensitive, my comment was meant as a joke, NOT about you OR
your rendering, which looks fine, but about the fact that a lot of what is
rendered in Pov-Ray and most raytracers is only photorealistic to you and us
raytracers, how many perfect sphere do you run into every day. Perhaps I
should have put a :-) in my message but I thought my intension was fairly
obvious and had nothing whatsoever to do with slitting your image.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
YKYBRTLW = You Know You've Been Raytracing Too Long When...
Am I right?
"Blane Bizzaro" <bla### [at] bizzarocreationscom> wrote in message
news:3cd4bfc7.179117284@news.povray.org...
> HA HA that was funny T. I always love it when people post jokes that
> only you and maybe one other person understand. Let's see if you can
> decrypt this one...FYAYMAMA2
>
> Cheers!
>
> On Sat, 4 May 2002 18:49:30 -0700, "Thomas Lake"
> <tla### [at] REMOVE-THISshawca> wrote:
>
> >> Just wondering if we have reached a saturation point. Is it possible
> >> to improve on this without using a camara?
> >
> >You mean the quality of the rendering? Hard to say I don't wonder into
too
> >many refractive spheres on infinite checkered planes while wondering
through
> >the fog with my camera, so I can't really say how much more realistic
this
> >can get. Frankly if I encountered such a scene in real life my first
thought
> >would be YKYBRTLW.
> >
> >
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> HA HA that was funny T. I always love it when people post jokes that
> only you and maybe one other person understand. Let's see if you can
> decrypt this one...FYAYMAMA2
Sorry I didn't realize you were new here, from that perspective I can see
how you would interpret my message as an insult. As Alastair pointed out
YKYBRTLW stands for "You Know You've Been Raytracing Too Long When..." Its
and inside joke around here.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
