 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
IRTC Spoiler...
Which image is better IYHO?
http://www.tomandlu.co.uk/uploads/v1.jpg (no gamma-correction)
http://www.tomandlu.co.uk/uploads/v2.jpg (gamma-correction)
--
#macro G(D,E,F)#local I=array[3]{D,E,F}#local B=0;triangle{#while(
B<3)#while(I[B])A[mod(I[B],10)]+#local I[B]=div(I[B],10);#end<-5,-
2,9>#local B=B+1;#end}#end #local A=array[7]{x,x*2,x*4,y,y*2,y*4,z
}light_source{-x*6-z*9,1}mesh{G(105,10,146)G(105,246,10)G(105,56,
146)G(105,1256,246)G(1256,126,220)G(22156,2216,201)pigment{rgb 1}}//TM
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
in news:3cce59ea$1@news.povray.org Tom Melly wrote:
> http://www.tomandlu.co.uk/uploads/v2.jpg (gamma-correction)
It has more "drama" in it.
Ingo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> http://www.tomandlu.co.uk/uploads/v2.jpg (gamma-correction)
I prefer this one. :o) Looks very good.
Regards,
Hugo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tom Melly" <tom### [at] tomandlu couk> wrote in message
news:3cce59ea$1@news.povray.org...
> IRTC Spoiler...
>
> Which image is better IYHO?
>
> http://www.tomandlu.co.uk/uploads/v1.jpg (no gamma-correction)
> http://www.tomandlu.co.uk/uploads/v2.jpg (gamma-correction)
>
Many thanks - v2 is wot I've submitted, but I was having a sudden panic.... This
highly scientific sample of 2 has confirmed I (and Lu) made the right choice....
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I also say V2, looks more realistic.
"Tom Melly" <tom### [at] tomandlucouk> wrote in message
news:3cce59ea$1@news.povray.org...
> IRTC Spoiler...
>
> Which image is better IYHO?
>
> http://www.tomandlu.co.uk/uploads/v1.jpg (no gamma-correction)
> http://www.tomandlu.co.uk/uploads/v2.jpg (gamma-correction)
>
> --
> #macro G(D,E,F)#local I=array[3]{D,E,F}#local B=0;triangle{#while(
> B<3)#while(I[B])A[mod(I[B],10)]+#local I[B]=div(I[B],10);#end<-5,-
> 2,9>#local B=B+1;#end}#end #local A=array[7]{x,x*2,x*4,y,y*2,y*4,z
> }light_source{-x*6-z*9,1}mesh{G(105,10,146)G(105,246,10)G(105,56,
> 146)G(105,1256,246)G(1256,126,220)G(22156,2216,201)pigment{rgb 1}}//TM
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
2 Gamma corrected
Nice image BTW
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I much prefer #2, the other is a little too dark on my monitor
and so it loses detail.
HB
"Tom Melly" <tom### [at] tomandlucouk> wrote in message
news:3cce59ea$1@news.povray.org...
> IRTC Spoiler...
>
> Which image is better IYHO?
>
> http://www.tomandlu.co.uk/uploads/v1.jpg (no gamma-correction)
> http://www.tomandlu.co.uk/uploads/v2.jpg (gamma-correction)
>
> --
> #macro G(D,E,F)#local I=array[3]{D,E,F}#local B=0;triangle{#while(
> B<3)#while(I[B])A[mod(I[B],10)]+#local I[B]=div(I[B],10);#end<-5,-
> 2,9>#local B=B+1;#end}#end #local A=array[7]{x,x*2,x*4,y,y*2,y*4,z
> }light_source{-x*6-z*9,1}mesh{G(105,10,146)G(105,246,10)G(105,56,
> 146)G(105,1256,246)G(1256,126,220)G(22156,2216,201)pigment{rgb 1}}//TM
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
