POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Duckie II Server Time
18 Nov 2024 10:24:02 EST (-0500)
  Duckie II (Message 1 to 6 of 6)  
From: TinCanMan
Subject: Duckie II
Date: 23 Apr 2002 15:07:53
Message: <3cc5b109@news.povray.org>
Here is my latest rubber duckie image.  Hopefully he looks a little happier
and less wooden now.  I attempted adding some sort of subsurface scattering
to the rubber with no success so I rempved it for now.

-tgq


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'Duckie4.JPG' (130 KB)

Preview of image 'Duckie4.JPG'
Duckie4.JPG


 

From: Shay
Subject: Re: Duckie II
Date: 23 Apr 2002 15:41:55
Message: <3cc5b903$1@news.povray.org>
Nice background. The duck still looks wooden. I think that the normal on the
bill contributes to this, also the sharp corners where the eye meets the
rest of the duck.

 -Shay

TinCanMan <Tin### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:3cc5b109@news.povray.org...


Post a reply to this message

From: TinCanMan
Subject: Re: Duckie II
Date: 23 Apr 2002 16:55:13
Message: <3cc5ca31$1@news.povray.org>
> Nice background. The duck still looks wooden. I think that the normal on
the
> bill contributes to this, also the sharp corners where the eye meets the
> rest of the duck.

Thanx.  Actually the bill and eyes are supposed to look painted, while the
body is yellow rubber.  I do agree about the eyes though, I should attach
them rather then making them seperate objects.

-tgq


Post a reply to this message

From: Jamie Davison
Subject: Re: Duckie II
Date: 23 Apr 2002 17:50:58
Message: <MPG.172fe7ba985da75b989b2d@news.povray.org>
> Thanx.  Actually the bill and eyes are supposed to look painted, while the
> body is yellow rubber.  I do agree about the eyes though, I should attach
> them rather then making them seperate objects.

I just thought I'd point out that paint on all the rubber ducks that I've 
seen doesn't have sharp edges, it always seems to have spread a little 
bit.  Maybe changing the sharp edges would help?

Jamie.


Post a reply to this message

From: Shay
Subject: Re: Duckie II
Date: 23 Apr 2002 17:56:36
Message: <3cc5d894@news.povray.org>
It is the bumpy normal on the bill and not the finish which I believe
contributed to the wooden effect.

 -Shay

TinCanMan <Tin### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:3cc5ca31$1@news.povray.org...


Post a reply to this message

From: Steve
Subject: Re: Duckie II
Date: 25 Apr 2002 06:56:28
Message: <slrnacfn14.qe5.steve@zeropps.org.uk>
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 15:07:44 -0400, TinCanMan wrote:
> Here is my latest rubber duckie image.  Hopefully he looks a little happier
> and less wooden now.  I attempted adding some sort of subsurface scattering
> to the rubber with no success so I rempved it for now.

I like the duck, but whoever's been scrubbing those tiles has far too much
time on their hands:-)

--
%HAV-A-NICEDAY                    email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
Steve                                web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
                                             or http://start.at/zero-pps
 11:35am  up 6 days,  8:15,  1 user,  load average: 1.12, 1.20, 1.13


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.