|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Here is a really weird abstract thingy I made. Textures were hand-coded (no
texture editors), and objects modeled in wmodeller. Render time = very low.
I
couldn't get focal blur to work with lens fx though... Any idea why?
What do you think?
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Halo.png' (128 KB)
Preview of image 'Halo.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yeah, focal blur blurs the objects (usually discs) that are close to the
camera (so that they are not behind something). No clues on a solution,
though.
--
__________________
RAY
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I don't know if there's anything to "get" here, but if there is I don't get
it. The background is nice, though. You might consider compressing your
images before posting. A small pic like this could probably compressed to
20kb without a noticeable loss in quality.
-Shay
Sam Van Oort <sam### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
news:3cc065f0@news.povray.org...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yeah, I shoulda JPEG'd it. ALthough, PNG is still fairly good compression,
128kb is excessive (by a bit). (To SHAY): Don't worry: there is nothing to
"get." I was just sorta pissed when I made the img, and it ended up weird.
(TO Ray:) Ray, do you TRACE? :-D. Sorry, couldn't resist. I figured the
problem was something of the sort. DO you know a fix?
ALso, here's another (MUCH SMALLER) abstract.
SAM
Sam Van Oort wrote in message <3cc065f0@news.povray.org>...
>Here is a really weird abstract thingy I made. Textures were hand-coded
(no
>texture editors), and objects modeled in wmodeller. Render time = very
low.
>I
>couldn't get focal blur to work with lens fx though... Any idea why?
>
>What do you think?
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Ringed_Tower.jpg' (54 KB)
Preview of image 'Ringed_Tower.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> (TO Ray:) Ray, do you TRACE? :-D. Sorry, couldn't resist.
#include "BIG_SMILEY_FACE.inc" // I'm glad to have found this ;-)
>I figured the problem was something of the sort. DO you know a fix?
If you are using Chris Colefax's Lens Effects set effect_always_on_top to
off, but that can cause the effects to go behind things.
> Also, here's another (MUCH SMALLER) abstract.
Very cool, that goes into my wallpaper collection
--
__________________
RAY
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Sam Van Oort" <sam### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
news:3cc0f56c@news.povray.org...
> I was just sorta pissed when I made the img,
>
Looking again, it does sort of have that feel to it.
I like your first abstract a lot better, because even though it is very (and
perhaps purposefully) ugly, it does appear very random. The second looks a
little cliche.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |