 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi,
Unfortunately I just can't find the time to try to model anything detailed,
so I decided to just do another simple scene, with fairly high Rad settings
and DOF too. Render time for this was approx 55 hours (dunno quite why it
was *so* high).
Rad settings were:
radiosity{
pretrace_start 1//0.16
pretrace_end 1//0.01
count 700
nearest_count 10
error_bound 0.1
recursion_limit 3
low_error_factor 1
gray_threshold 0.5
minimum_reuse 0.015
brightness 1.2
}
.., still not got rid of some artifacts on the walls, and will probably
always use subtle color_maps in future to avoid flat solid areas of colour.
Seen this done before, I know, but anyone like this?
All the best,
Andy Cocker
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Sphere_Room.jpg' (104 KB)
Preview of image 'Sphere_Room.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ice cream with sprinkles? But it must be very cold there, or they wouldn't be so
round.. but they're in the sun either way, so they
should be at least _partially_ melted.. maybe they're that non-melting ice cream that
Rhoald (sp?) Dahl came up with... hm..
Maybe I'll shut up now. Very nice image. ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Seen this done before, I know, but anyone like this?
I haven't seen something like this before; very original, candy-like,
inviting, great lighted raytracing, but most people will think 55 hours is
monstrous.
Regards,
Hugo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I like it a lot.
The image does look very "jaw-breaker" or "snoball" like.
How are you making the light source? Is it a cylinder type?
Are there any photons in the scene?
"Andrew Cocker" <big### [at] mariner9 fsnetcouk> wrote in message
news:3caed697@news.povray.org...
> Hi,
>
> Unfortunately I just can't find the time to try to model anything
detailed,
> so I decided to just do another simple scene, with fairly high Rad
settings
> and DOF too. Render time for this was approx 55 hours (dunno quite why it
> was *so* high).
> Rad settings were:
>
> radiosity{
> pretrace_start 1//0.16
> pretrace_end 1//0.01
> count 700
> nearest_count 10
> error_bound 0.1
> recursion_limit 3
> low_error_factor 1
> gray_threshold 0.5
> minimum_reuse 0.015
> brightness 1.2
> }
>
> .., still not got rid of some artifacts on the walls, and will probably
> always use subtle color_maps in future to avoid flat solid areas of
colour.
>
> Seen this done before, I know, but anyone like this?
>
> All the best,
>
> Andy Cocker
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This image looks terrific.
Will you post the source?
Really neat, not much more too add, is there? ;-)
--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
very cool
and freaky
they are phantom Ice Cream scoops with sprinkle attack action.
:)
Andrew Cocker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Unfortunately I just can't find the time to try to model anything detailed,
> so I decided to just do another simple scene, with fairly high Rad settings
> and DOF too. Render time for this was approx 55 hours (dunno quite why it
> was *so* high).
> Rad settings were:
>
> radiosity{
> pretrace_start 1//0.16
> pretrace_end 1//0.01
> count 700
> nearest_count 10
> error_bound 0.1
> recursion_limit 3
> low_error_factor 1
> gray_threshold 0.5
> minimum_reuse 0.015
> brightness 1.2
> }
>
> .., still not got rid of some artifacts on the walls, and will probably
> always use subtle color_maps in future to avoid flat solid areas of colour.
>
> Seen this done before, I know, but anyone like this?
>
> All the best,
>
> Andy Cocker
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Mahalis" <don### [at] fakeycom> wrote in message
news:3caf02dd$1@news.povray.org...
> Ice cream with sprinkles? But it must be very cold there, or they wouldn't
be so round.. but they're in the sun either way, so they
> should be at least _partially_ melted.. maybe they're that non-melting ice
cream that Rhoald (sp?) Dahl came up with... hm..
> Maybe I'll shut up now. Very nice image. ;-)
Nope.. just spheres with smaller spheres on top. Mmmmm...
Thanks :-)
Andy Cocker
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Hugo" <hua### [at] post3teledk> wrote in message
news:3caf0c43$1@news.povray.org...
> I haven't seen something like this before; very original, candy-like,
> inviting, great lighted raytracing, but most people will think 55 hours is
> monstrous.
Just meant, more spheres, y'know? I *certainly* think 55 hours is monstrous,
and it maybe didn't need to take that long.. I just never found out what it
was that was slowing it down the most.. I know Radiosity hates curves. DOF
didn't help either ;-)
Andy Cocker
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Patrick Dugan" <pat### [at] netinsnet> wrote in message
news:3caf106e@news.povray.org...
> I like it a lot.
Thank you
> How are you making the light source? Is it a cylinder type?
Just an area_light with it's rgb *8
> Are there any photons in the scene?
Nope.
Andy Cocker
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tim Nikias" <tim### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
news:3CAF140E.F44B290F@gmx.de...
> This image looks terrific.
Thank you Tim
> Will you post the source?
Sure, if you want it. Will post it now to p.text-files
> Really neat, not much more too add, is there? ;-)
No ;-)
Andy Cocker
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
