POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Radiosity test (~110 KB.) Server Time
1 Nov 2024 09:22:17 EDT (-0400)
  Radiosity test (~110 KB.) (Message 1 to 10 of 24)  
Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: JRG
Subject: Radiosity test (~110 KB.)
Date: 29 Mar 2002 12:51:44
Message: <3ca4a9b0@news.povray.org>
I'm trying to get the lighting right for my kitchen scene. This is an early test
render.
No lights were used, just pure radiosity. I couldn't use better settings for lack of
memory.
Render time (with MUCH swapping): about 7 hours.
The grainess of the red cupboard was enhanced by the jpeg compression.
I will probably use a warmer light for the final scene.

Cheers,

--
Jonathan.

Home: http://digilander.iol.it/jrgpov


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'prova_luci.jpg' (110 KB)

Preview of image 'prova_luci.jpg'
prova_luci.jpg


 

From: Rick [Kitty5]
Subject: Re: Radiosity test (~110 KB.) - AWSOME ROLEX
Date: 29 Mar 2002 13:03:14
Message: <3ca4ac62$1@news.povray.org>
enough said


--
Rick

Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037

PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA


Post a reply to this message

From: John Robinson
Subject: Re: Radiosity test (~110 KB.)
Date: 29 Mar 2002 13:11:35
Message: <3ca4ae57$1@news.povray.org>
"JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:3ca4a9b0@news.povray.org...
> I'm trying to get the lighting right for my kitchen scene. This is an
early test
> render.
> No lights were used, just pure radiosity. I couldn't use better settings
for lack of
> memory.
> Render time (with MUCH swapping): about 7 hours.
> The grainess of the red cupboard was enhanced by the jpeg compression.
> I will probably use a warmer light for the final scene.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Jonathan.
>
> Home: http://digilander.iol.it/jrgpov
>

well done.  good sense of realism here.  you could increase max trace level
maybe to get rid of blackness around the glass.  of course it wouldnt
exactly help your render time.
and just swap the wine for a bottle of the finest macallan scotch whisky. oh
aye :)

john


Post a reply to this message

From: Jan Walzer
Subject: Re: Radiosity test (~110 KB.)
Date: 29 Mar 2002 13:18:46
Message: <3ca4b006@news.povray.org>
Photo, Photo !!!


Post a reply to this message

From: Marc Jacquier
Subject: Re: Radiosity test (~110 KB.)
Date: 29 Mar 2002 13:27:51
Message: <3ca4b227$1@news.povray.org>
Hey!
Early test?
Stop humiliate us :)
Marc


Post a reply to this message

From: Marc Jacquier
Subject: Re: Radiosity test (~110 KB.)
Date: 29 Mar 2002 13:33:22
Message: <3ca4b372$1@news.povray.org>

3ca4ae57$1@news.povray.org...
>
> and just swap the wine for a bottle of the finest macallan scotch whisky.
oh
> aye :)
>
> john
>
Hey a good wine isn't so bad and if a whisky why not a Laphroaig? :c)
Marc


Post a reply to this message

From: Skip Talbot
Subject: Re: Radiosity test (~110 KB.)
Date: 29 Mar 2002 15:18:19
Message: <3ca4cc0b@news.povray.org>
I'd frame that and hang it on my wall

--



Skip


Post a reply to this message

From: ingo
Subject: Re: Radiosity test (~110 KB.)
Date: 29 Mar 2002 15:20:15
Message: <Xns91E0D972CF4B2seed7@povray.org>
in news:3ca4a9b0@news.povray.org JRG wrote:

> This is an early test render.

Looks very good,
although it is a test run a few minor comments, the finish of the red 
stuff on the top of the wine bottle doesn't look good, too dull. The 
cork is too bright, unless it's one of those cork faking plastic corks. 
The colors on the wine bottels lable look a bit washed out, as if a 
gamma correction is applied twice. It's not in harmony with the rest of 
the scene. For the wine glass have you scaled the wine smaller than the 
glass? If so, try scale it a bit bigger than the glass, it may look more 
natural.
Couldn't resist what I usually do with photos, cover parts of them with 
white paper to change / improve compostition. Result, cropped the image 
to about 510X670 counting from the top right hand side. It chops of the 
top of the bottle on its side and brings the left hand side of the wine 
bottle to about 1/3 of the image.

Ingo


Post a reply to this message

From: Hugo
Subject: Re: Radiosity test (~110 KB.)
Date: 29 Mar 2002 16:47:16
Message: <3ca4e0e4@news.povray.org>
Great setup!  :o)  But two questions I have:  How could you render this so
quickly when there is blurred reflection and glass in the scene? I thought
it would be impossible. And how much memory is in your computer?

I think the light from the window is from a cloudy day. Because it's not
possible to have sunlight and pure radiosity - it will lack specular
highlights... Am I right?

Best regards,
Hugo


Post a reply to this message

From: Peter Popov
Subject: Re: Radiosity test (~110 KB.)
Date: 29 Mar 2002 17:27:39
Message: <blp9au432vqhrhjeisv6egffo5f22uh3i7@4ax.com>
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 19:34:30 +0100, "Marc Jacquier"
<jac### [at] wanadoofr> wrote:

>Hey a good wine isn't so bad and if a whisky why not a Laphroaig? :c)

Aye! Aye! Where? Where?

The one time I had a Laphroaig, it was the best whiskey I've ever
had!!! I haven't ever seen it sold here, but if I ever do, I'll get a
bottle for the finest moments in life, even if it takes saving for a
month.


Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vipbg
TAG      e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg


Post a reply to this message

Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.