POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Updated clouds Server Time
19 Nov 2024 02:36:49 EST (-0500)
  Updated clouds (Message 1 to 8 of 8)  
From: Skip Talbot
Subject: Updated clouds
Date: 3 Feb 2002 05:04:49
Message: <3c5d0b41@news.povray.org>
Just got done running another go at some POV clouds.  I took all of your
comments into consideration.  I darkened the cloud base.  I randomized the
size of the clouds as well.  The larger clouds give more influence to the
gumdrop equation and thus have flatter bottoms.  I also used the cloud
equation for the media's density so it fluffs better on the edges.

Notice the time difference between this post and my last cloud post.  That's
about how long it took to render  ;)


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'cloud test 16.jpg' (20 KB)

Preview of image 'cloud test 16.jpg'
cloud test 16.jpg


 

From: Alf Peake
Subject: Re: Updated clouds
Date: 3 Feb 2002 09:49:42
Message: <3c5d4e06@news.povray.org>
Looks very good. Clouds maybe a little coarse, like a close up of
cotton-wool. As part of a full scene I don't think that anyone could
find fault. But I guess with render time increasing as the square of
quality (?) I would have given up long ago.

> Notice the time difference between this post and my last cloud
> post. That's about how long it took to render  ;)

Unless my OE5.5 has dropped some posts, 24 Jan 2002 was your last? A
10 day render? Wow!

Alf


Post a reply to this message

From: Skip Talbot
Subject: Re: Updated clouds
Date: 3 Feb 2002 13:39:33
Message: <3c5d83e5$1@news.povray.org>
That was a bit of an exaggeration.  I did two full quality renderings since
that post.  Using media method 3 increased my render time by about a day (2
and a half days total) so I changed it back to 2 (1 and a half days total).
The render time is horrendously slow but I'm willing to accept it for the
realism and quality of the clouds.  When I do a final render I probably
won't use as many clouds.  I'm also going to divvy up the render across 10
or 12 PIII 900's in the dorm's basement computer lab.

Skip


Post a reply to this message

From: Grey Knight
Subject: Re: Updated clouds
Date: 4 Feb 2002 07:14:06
Message: <3C5E7B08.3BD28E41@namtar.qub.ac.uk>
Very nice, but the closer ones still look a bit "solid" somehow.

-- 
signature{
  "Grey Knight" contact{ email "gre### [at] yahoocom" }
  site_of_week{ url "http://digilander.iol.it/jrgpov" }
}


Post a reply to this message

From: Alf Peake
Subject: Re: Updated clouds
Date: 4 Feb 2002 10:56:47
Message: <3c5eaf3f@news.povray.org>
"Skip Talbot" <sta### [at] uiucedu> wrote in message
news:3c5d83e5$1@news.povray.org...
[snip]
> I'm also going to divvy up the render across 10
> or 12 PIII 900's in the dorm's basement computer lab.

Its allright for some innit?
;-)

Alf


Post a reply to this message

From:
Subject: Re: Updated clouds
Date: 5 Feb 2002 01:05:29
Message: <3c5f7629$1@news.povray.org>
I think they are beautiful.

Congratulations,

Fernando.


Post a reply to this message

From: Skip Talbot
Subject: Re: Updated clouds
Date: 5 Feb 2002 14:05:11
Message: <3c602ce7@news.povray.org>
Thanks Fernando


Post a reply to this message

From: Mitchell Waite
Subject: Re: Updated clouds
Date: 7 Feb 2002 02:44:37
Message: <3c623065$1@news.povray.org>
I think they are beautiful. Are you going to post the source so we can learn
from your efforts?

"Skip Talbot" <sta### [at] uiucedu> wrote in message
news:3c5d0b41@news.povray.org...
> Just got done running another go at some POV clouds.  I took all of your
> comments into consideration.  I darkened the cloud base.  I randomized the
> size of the clouds as well.  The larger clouds give more influence to the
> gumdrop equation and thus have flatter bottoms.  I also used the cloud
> equation for the media's density so it fluffs better on the edges.
>
> Notice the time difference between this post and my last cloud post.
That's
> about how long it took to render  ;)
>
>
>


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.