POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Fern again, it's getting better (29,4kB) Server Time
1 Nov 2024 23:14:49 EDT (-0400)
  Fern again, it's getting better (29,4kB) (Message 1 to 10 of 15)  
Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 5 Messages >>>
From:
Subject: Fern again, it's getting better (29,4kB)
Date: 17 Jan 2002 18:26:44
Message: <3c475db4@news.povray.org>
Hi there, all who are interested in ferns ;-)
Another update after I rewrote the code for the wing completely and studied
intensively my fern in my living room....

The shape of the wing is fine now, as well the leaves. Some open points are
still colouring while aging and the texture of the central fold of the wing.
(It still misses it's "hairs")
regards
SY


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'fern.jpg' (30 KB)

Preview of image 'fern.jpg'
fern.jpg


 

From:
Subject: Re: Detail
Date: 17 Jan 2002 18:45:24
Message: <3c476214@news.povray.org>
although it doesn't show anything new, I like the picture.
Perspective of a grasshopper ;-)

I think it's realistic enough for close-up shots, is it?


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'fern_detail.jpg' (10 KB)

Preview of image 'fern_detail.jpg'
fern_detail.jpg


 

From: Zeger Knaepen
Subject: Re: Fern again, it's getting better (29,4kB)
Date: 17 Jan 2002 20:47:37
Message: <3c477eb9$1@news.povray.org>
wonderful!
How fast is it? (Both trace-time and parse-time)

cu!
--
camera{location-z*3}#macro G(b,e)b+(e-b)*(C/50)#end#macro L(b,e,k,l)#local C=0
;#while(C<50)sphere{G(b,e),.1pigment{rgb G(k,l)}finish{ambient 1}}#local C=C+1
;#end#end L(y-x,y,x,x+y)L(y,-x-y,x+y,y)L(-x-y,-y,y,y+z)L(-y,y,y+z,x+y)L(0,x+y,
<.5,1,.5>,x)L(0,x-y,<.5,1,.5>,x)               // ZK http://www.povplace.be.tf


Post a reply to this message

From: Fernando González del Cueto
Subject: Re: Fern again, it's getting better (29,4kB)
Date: 17 Jan 2002 21:03:20
Message: <3c478268@news.povray.org>
I believe it is really getting much better! In your other image I thought it
wasn't that realistic to let the "younger" leaves be old, which is fixed in
this one.

Congratulations,

Fernando.


Post a reply to this message

From: Slime
Subject: Re: Detail
Date: 18 Jan 2002 01:23:12
Message: <3c47bf50$1@news.povray.org>
I like these fern images. The only thing that seems unrealistic is that
stem, made of shiney cylinders and spheres, it seems. Think you could fix
that up a bit? Looks too plastic. Otherwise it's pretty darn realistic, and
I'd like to see an include file. =)

- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
[ http://www.slimeland.com/images/ ]


Post a reply to this message

From: Christoph Hormann
Subject: Re: Fern again, it's getting better (29,4kB)
Date: 18 Jan 2002 02:49:39
Message: <3C47D392.3AF564BA@gmx.de>

> 
> Hi there, all who are interested in ferns ;-)
> Another update after I rewrote the code for the wing completely and studied
> intensively my fern in my living room....
> 
> The shape of the wing is fine now, as well the leaves. Some open points are
> still colouring while aging and the texture of the central fold of the wing.
> (It still misses it's "hairs")

The leafs look very good now, but i think they still do not join smoothly
with the stem.

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other 
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/


Post a reply to this message

From: Juergen Scharfy
Subject: Re: Detail
Date: 18 Jan 2002 03:16:23
Message: <3c47d9d7@news.povray.org>
> I like these fern images. The only thing that seems unrealistic is that
> stem, made of shiney cylinders and spheres, it seems. Think you could fix

You are right. It really looks like plastic. Strange enough, the leaf I have
here (a real one) looks also like plastic. But the stem there is oviously
smaller and not that smooth. Maybe this is the problem.
I'll workon that. Thanks!

> that up a bit? Looks too plastic. Otherwise it's pretty darn realistic,
and
> I'd like to see an include file. =)

No problem. As soon as it grows out of the "beta" stage ;)


Post a reply to this message

From: Juergen Scharfy
Subject: Re: Fern again, it's getting better (29,4kB)
Date: 18 Jan 2002 03:21:31
Message: <3c47db0b@news.povray.org>
> wonderful!

THX

> How fast is it? (Both trace-time and parse-time)

You mean how slow? ;-))
Just kidding. Before I talk about speed you need to know on which CPU I'm
working. My PC is pretty old and runs a P200. Please note that it is a very
first, old Pentium (no MMX, no PII,PIII or even PIV). The good old plain
P200 (you remember the FPU float division problem?). This old P200 drives a
very old Win95 (one of the very firs releases)

Now about speed.

The big picture I posted was rendered in 640x480 AA0.3 and took in total
10min 33sec. I think thats not too bad.
The picture shows two wings, the big one has 2x 30 leaves and the small one
2x 20.

regards,
SY


Post a reply to this message

From: Juergen Scharfy
Subject: Re: Fern again, it's getting better (29,4kB)
Date: 18 Jan 2002 03:26:14
Message: <3c47dc26$1@news.povray.org>
> The leafs look very good now, but i think they still do not join smoothly
> with the stem.

Hm. I will have to do a close-up of the stem.
As far as I analysed my fern in the living room is the junction of the
leaves to the stem quite strange. The leaves overlap the stem so that you
hardly see it. Only in the upper regions (where the density of the leaves is
lower) it comes out.
Anyway the stem is an open point since it texture isn't right yet. The
colour should be green on the top and brownish at the root.

thanks and regards
SY


Post a reply to this message

From: Hugo
Subject: Re: Fern again, it's getting better (29,4kB)
Date: 18 Jan 2002 04:09:09
Message: <3c47e635@news.povray.org>
A slow computer is a good way to force one to code stuff the right way.  :o)
It looks much better now! I think the leafs are best at a distance because
the texture doesn't show the venes realistic at close-up. But in most scenes
this won't be a problem and it would probably be meaningless to spend more
resources at the tiny venes.

I don't have a real leaf in front of me, but the long one seems too long and
stiff at the small end. You seem to be using a fixed distance between each
leaf that makes me wonder if the real thing looks that way.

Great that you will be sharing the code with us!  :o)  I look forward to
that!

Hugo


Post a reply to this message

Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 5 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.