Hi for all who are interested:
An update of the fern is attached. More detail at the single leaves, macro
optimisation and extended shape of the entire wing (irregularities and
torsion). Some more minor updates.

A Detail shot will follow

have fun!
SY

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'fern.jpg' (22 KB)

Preview of image 'fern.jpg'

> A Detail shot will follow

...which is THIS
SY

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'fern_detail.jpg' (46 KB)

Preview of image 'fern_detail.jpg'

news:3c4607cd@news.povray.org...
> Hi for all who are interested:
> An update of the fern is attached. More detail at the single leaves, macro
> optimisation and extended shape of the entire wing (irregularities and
> torsion). Some more minor updates.

Been following this a little.  Mimics a fern very well, only that the gray
color for older leaves could use a brown-gold coppery color I believe.
As for the close-up, unless used for rendering insect life or other such
small scale scenes that fern leaf would be great for general vegetation as
seen from a distance.  Is it computationally intensive and slow or
something?  Or would a full fern plant, and many of them, be easily (read
that as quickly) rendered?

bob h

Post a reply to this message

> Hi for all who are interested:
> An update of the fern is attached. More detail at the single leaves, macro
> optimisation and extended shape of the entire wing (irregularities and
> torsion). Some more minor updates.

I really like these fern images you've been posting. You've really paid a
great deal of attention to detail here, I especially like the small random
rips and tears in the leaves. However to get the full effect I think a
rendering of a whole plant would be good, its hard to tell from one leaf how
well it will work as a whole.

Post a reply to this message

> Been following this a little.  Mimics a fern very well, only that the gray
> color for older leaves could use a brown-gold coppery color I believe.

You're right. I'm still not satisfied with the texture. For new and "adult"
leaves it's quite well. For the old ones it doesn't fit yet. I'm still
working on that. (please note that the algorithm which assembles the whole
"wing" is still quite experimental. The sizes aren't ok yet and the old
leaves aren't full integrated in it)

> As for the close-up, unless used for rendering insect life or other such
> small scale scenes that fern leaf would be great for general vegetation as

I think I will reuse the small, single leaf (not the whole wing) as a leaf
of grass. Just changing the proportions (make it taller and longer) would
result in a perfect grass, wouldn't it?

> seen from a distance.  Is it computationally intensive and slow or
> something?  Or would a full fern plant, and many of them, be easily (read
> that as quickly) rendered?

That is hard to tell for me since my computer is a very old P200 (note: not
a PII or PIII, just the very basic Pentium even without any MMX or so...)
So ANY render takes a while on my PC ;-)

Basically:
A single leaf is rendered quickly. It's an automatically computed mesh with
an adaptive number of smooth_triangles. The triangles are fully computed and
differ from leaf to leaf. The main part of rendering time is parsing.
Tracing itself is rather quickly.
The picture I posted (the full wing) was rendered at 640x480 AA0.3 and it
took approx 5minutes on my old P200.

Some data:
a single leaf holds 20-120 smooth triangles (2 times 10-60, left and right
half) depending on the degree of "wrinkles". The fern I posted holds 2 times
30 leaves which makes approx. 60 meshes with about 600 smooth_triangles. To
build a realistic, complete fern it may take up to 10 or even 20 wings.

regards,

Post a reply to this message

Juergen Scharfy wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> Some data:
> a single leaf holds 20-120 smooth triangles (2 times 10-60, left and right
> half) depending on the degree of "wrinkles". The fern I posted holds 2 times
> 30 leaves which makes approx. 60 meshes with about 600 smooth_triangles. To
> build a realistic, complete fern it may take up to 10 or even 20 wings.
> 

It would probably be much faster if you make the whole wing one mesh.

BTW, the central fold seems to have some problems, the 'leafs' do not join
smoothly.

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other 
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message

> It would probably be much faster if you make the whole wing one mesh.

Since every leaf has two different textures and every leaf within a wing
differs in colour and texture from the others I don't think that it is a
good idea to make one big mesh. AFAIK it's not possible to give every
triangle within a mesh a different texture? (I'm working with POV 3.1g since
the last beta I copied (3.5Beta9) stopped working on 15th of Jan.)

> BTW, the central fold seems to have some problems, the 'leafs' do not join
> smoothly.

The central fold of the wing or of the leaves?

Post a reply to this message

> I really like these fern images you've been posting. You've really paid a
> great deal of attention to detail here, I especially like the small random

Yes, the detail is important for my scene since at least one "wing" will be
in the front of the scene.

> rips and tears in the leaves. However to get the full effect I think a
> rendering of a whole plant would be good, its hard to tell from one leaf
how
> well it will work as a whole.

Of course. Right now I just finished the basics of the small leaves. All the
rest is very experimental.
I'm very eger to create a full fern to see if it's realistic enough!
SY

Post a reply to this message

> 
> Since every leaf has two different textures and every leaf within a wing
> differs in colour and texture from the others I don't think that it is a
> good idea to make one big mesh. AFAIK it's not possible to give every
> triangle within a mesh a different texture? (I'm working with POV 3.1g since
> the last beta I copied (3.5Beta9) stopped working on 15th of Jan.)
> 

You can, uv-mapping would be another possibility, i don't know which uses
less memory.

> > BTW, the central fold seems to have some problems, the 'leafs' do not join
> > smoothly.
> 
> The central fold of the wing or of the leaves?

Of the wing.

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other 
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message

> > good idea to make one big mesh. AFAIK it's not possible to give every
> > triangle within a mesh a different texture? (I'm working with POV 3.1g
since
> > the last beta I copied (3.5Beta9) stopped working on 15th of Jan.)
> >
>
> You can, uv-mapping would be another possibility, i don't know which uses
> less memory.

How? I tried it but got an error. As well there is no hint about textured
mesh-triangles in the help.
I was looking for uv_mapping as well. I found it in 3.5b9 but NOT in 3.1g.

Am I too stupid?

> > The central fold of the wing or of the leaves?
>
> Of the wing.

I just rewrote the complete code of the wing. Anyway, it was only a testing
code. Now it looks much more realistic than before.
Have a look at the new update!

regards
SY

Post a reply to this message