 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Well things are coming along quicker and better than I had planned. Just
need to start modelling some desktop stationary etc...
Suggestions and comments are more than welcome.
Davey B
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'radiosity_office.jpg' (55 KB)
Preview of image 'radiosity_office.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Davey B" <kryten@*NOSPAM*totalise.co.uk> wrote in news:3c1d0400
@news.povray.org:
> Well things are coming along quicker and better than I had planned. Just
> need to start modelling some desktop stationary etc...
>
> Suggestions and comments are more than welcome.
Is that a mirror where the window is supposed to be? :-) The reflection
intensity looks unnaturally high. Are you using the fresnel reflection
model?
Also, I'm not sure a typical office would need that many pillars to support
the roof. Just a thought.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi
> Is that a mirror where the window is supposed to be? :-) The reflection
> intensity looks unnaturally high. Are you using the fresnel reflection
> model?
The reflection is a little high and will be fixed in the next render. Im not
using fresnel reflection at the moment but may do in the final.
> Also, I'm not sure a typical office would need that many pillars to
support
> the roof. Just a thought.
Hey, I built that ceiling, and the amount of corners I cut the pillars its
got might not be enough to hold it ;-)
Davey B
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Well things are coming along quicker and better than I had planned. Just
> need to start modelling some desktop stationary etc...
seems to look a little flat, perhaps making it a bit brighter, and using dof
will help
--
Rick
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi
> seems to look a little flat, perhaps making it a bit brighter, and using
dof
> will help
Fair comment but I think dof will be for the final of final traces. I know
it adds that touch of realism but I think it will increase the trace time
too much.
Thanks
Davey B
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rather than reply to both this one and the previous...
Lost your chairs in it this time, got pretty dark. Might up the diffuse
some or up the reflection. Might check into using exponent
(reflection_exponent in v3.1) for both the glass to limit darker parts from
being shown.
I think you could still have the outdoors scenery be more glowing, as if
photographed and daylight overcoming the darker interior. Except that if
the windows are tinted that wouldn't be wise then. Needs a way to shine
light in more though, without it going oversaturated at the same time.
radiosity can't see a no_image object so guess that's ruled out.
Your other message post and rendering did show me what I had wondered about,
thanks.
--
text{ttf"arial","bob h",.1,0pigment{rgb 9}translate<-1,-.2,3>}
"Davey B" <kryten@*NOSPAM*totalise.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3c1d0400@news.povray.org...
> Well things are coming along quicker and better than I had planned. Just
> need to start modelling some desktop stationary etc...
>
> Suggestions and comments are more than welcome.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
A lot better than the first one.
I would recommend to set all ambient values strictly to zero. The 3d effect
will be enhenced by this.
Second you should double or even triple the color value of your ceiling
lights (I suppose, you use lights).
Soon you will have to use better radiosity settings. To avoid ugly
artifacts, you should use a normal (perhaps granite) for the walls and
pillars.
Norbert
"Davey B" <kryten@*NOSPAM*totalise.co.uk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:3c1d0400@news.povray.org...
> Well things are coming along quicker and better than I had planned. Just
> need to start modelling some desktop stationary etc...
>
> Suggestions and comments are more than welcome.
>
> Davey B
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Fair comment but I think dof will be for the final of final traces. I know
> it adds that touch of realism but I think it will increase the trace time
> too much.
if your using the 3.5 beta, dof isnt much slower than good AA
--
Rick
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Christoph Hormann
Subject: Re: Radiosity Office (WIP Take 2) 55k
Date: 17 Dec 2001 16:44:32
Message: <3C1E673F.11ECAD8@gmx.de>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Davey B wrote:
>
> Well things are coming along quicker and better than I had planned. Just
> need to start modelling some desktop stationary etc...
>
> Suggestions and comments are more than welcome.
>
Much more realistic than before IMO, the lights could probably be
stronger, nobody would want to work in such a dark office... ;-)
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmx de>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
