 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
No big changes. I just lowered transmit to 0.6 and added double_illuminate
to both the candles. I also added an IOR of 1.1 to the wax. The scene is
just for testing wax' behaviour in more complex scenes. This scene was meant
to be rendered with focal_blur, but 10 pps at the first lines (where there
are no objects...) was too slow for me. Radiosity used. Render time: 3h 49m
5s.
Forgot to say that a third candle was put behind the camera.
Comments?
p.s. Who knows who has put my binoculars there...
--
Jonathan.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'waxscatt.jpg' (86 KB)
Preview of image 'waxscatt.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
O M G !
I demand that you hand over your source code for those exquisite
materials... :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I'm getting a court order....
--
Skip
Tony[B] <ben### [at] catholic org> wrote in message
news:3bc9e85d@news.povray.org...
> O M G !
>
> I demand that you hand over your source code for those exquisite
> materials... :)
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:3bc9e6cd@news.povray.org...
> No big changes. I just lowered transmit to 0.6 and added double_illuminate
> to both the candles. I also added an IOR of 1.1 to the wax. The scene is
> just for testing wax' behaviour in more complex scenes. This scene was
meant
> to be rendered with focal_blur, but 10 pps at the first lines (where there
> are no objects...) was too slow for me. Radiosity used. Render time: 3h
49m
> 5s.
> Forgot to say that a third candle was put behind the camera.
>
> Comments?
Fantastic. Might the refraction be causing the bright/dim midpoints of the
candles? It just looks like a gradient with slight turbulence though.
Bob H.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bob, you wrote:
> Fantastic.
Thanks!
>Might the refraction be causing the bright/dim midpoints of the
> candles? It just looks like a gradient with slight turbulence though.
Blob artifacts I think. I'll try sturm solver next time.
--
Jonathan.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Looks great! One thing I noted.. In each candle there appears to be a crack
in the wax. Now they could be there on purpose, or they could be something
unwanted. Thought I'd point them out to you. And as Tony requested, any
chance of seeing the source on this wonderful scene? :{)
David
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'cracks.jpg' (15 KB)
Preview of image 'cracks.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Incredible !!!.
It's always a pleasure to see your work, but this one is really fantastic.
Everything is perfect, the flames, the wax, the gold, the table...
Will you share the code?. I would like to learn how you did it.
(I'm on my knees right now ;-)
--
Txemi Jendrix
tji### [at] euskalnetnet
http://www.geocities.com/txemijendrix
news:3bc9e6cd@news.povray.org...
> No big changes. I just lowered transmit to 0.6 and added double_illuminate
> to both the candles. I also added an IOR of 1.1 to the wax. The scene is
> just for testing wax' behaviour in more complex scenes. This scene was
meant
> to be rendered with focal_blur, but 10 pps at the first lines (where there
> are no objects...) was too slow for me. Radiosity used. Render time: 3h
49m
> 5s.
> Forgot to say that a third candle was put behind the camera.
>
> Comments?
>
>
> p.s. Who knows who has put my binoculars there...
>
> --
> Jonathan.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Amazing! Good realism. That's some odd stemware though, looks like it
should be made of glass or else thicker and wider.
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I love those flames.
Alf
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I guess they could be due to the candle behind the camera?
Alf
"David Heys" <sou### [at] gcinet> wrote in message
news:3bca0136@news.povray.org...
> Looks great! One thing I noted.. In each candle there appears to be
a crack
> in the wax. Now they could be there on purpose, or they could be
something
> unwanted. Thought I'd point them out to you. And as Tony requested,
any
> chance of seeing the source on this wonderful scene? :{)
>
> David
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
