POV-Ray: Newsgroups: povray.binaries.images: "new isofun" variation

POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : "new isofun" variation		Server Time 20 Nov 2024 02:29:47 EST (-0500)

From: Ruy
Subject: "new isofun" variation
Date: 11 Oct 2001 13:50:39
Message: <3bc5dbef@news.povray.org>

I've stuffed some trigonometrics on the spiral-sphere, posted by Chaps on
Oct 4. Instead of the 2+ hours of rendering, the 1024x768 AA0.3 version of
this one took me 2d17h38m27s to render, with a record max_gradient of 247
(still on the Celeron 600Mhz, 128MB RAM, WinMe I have at work).

Does it bring William Blake to anyone else's mind, or am I just being way
too self-indulgent?

Ruy

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'func640.jpg' (23 KB)

Preview of image 'func640.jpg'

From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: "new isofun" variation
Date: 11 Oct 2001 22:02:35
Message: <3BC65015.794A1959@faricy.net>

I liked the others better; this seems two-dimensional, like a lithograph
actually...  interesting spheres nonetheless.

-- 
David Fontaine  <dav### [at] faricynet>  ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery:  http://davidf.faricy.net/

Post a reply to this message

From: Chaps
Subject: Re: "new isofun" variation
Date: 12 Oct 2001 11:28:38
Message: <3bc70c26@news.povray.org>

I like this "2D" effect.

I just tried the version proposed by R. Suzuki, it seems to be much faster,
I'll try it during weekend and try to understand. Anyway I got a new PC at
home much faster: less than 3h :o)))))

Chaps.


"Ruy" <ruy### [at] hipernetcombr> wrote in message
news:3bc5dbef@news.povray.org...
> I've stuffed some trigonometrics on the spiral-sphere, posted by Chaps on
> Oct 4. Instead of the 2+ hours of rendering, the 1024x768 AA0.3 version of
> this one took me 2d17h38m27s to render, with a record max_gradient of 247
> (still on the Celeron 600Mhz, 128MB RAM, WinMe I have at work).
>
> Does it bring William Blake to anyone else's mind, or am I just being way
> too self-indulgent?
>
> Ruy
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Post a reply to this message