 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
A glass sphere on a wood table with photons and focal blur.
The first image was rendered in MegaPOV 0.7 - 11m 39s (1m 5s photons, 10m
34s trace)
The second in POVRay 3.5b1 - 10m 5s (1s parse, 47s photons, 9m 17s trace)
Both scenes are virtually identical (syntax excepted), any comments?
-tgq
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'TestMP.jpg' (133 KB)
Download 'TestPR.jpg' (115 KB)
Preview of image 'TestMP.jpg'
Preview of image 'TestPR.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Looks nice, but your wood texture looks different.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
i've noticed the same things.. pov 3.5 images seem a lot darker than
MegaPov's with the same options..
it just shows the mega pov and pov 3.5 are two different monsters
-darrell
"Trevor Quayle" <Tin### [at] hotmail com> wrote in message
news:3b97c69e@news.povray.org...
> A glass sphere on a wood table with photons and focal blur.
>
> The first image was rendered in MegaPOV 0.7 - 11m 39s (1m 5s photons, 10m
> 34s trace)
> The second in POVRay 3.5b1 - 10m 5s (1s parse, 47s photons, 9m 17s trace)
>
> Both scenes are virtually identical (syntax excepted), any comments?
>
> -tgq
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tony[B]" <ben### [at] catholicorg> wrote in message
news:3b97d57f@news.povray.org...
> Looks nice, but your wood texture looks different.
>
>
They are the same but the colours do seem somewhat darker in POV 3.5
-tgq
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Trevor Quayle <Tin### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
: They are the same but the colours do seem somewhat darker in POV 3.5
It might be related to a different default gamma correction.
--
#macro N(D,I)#if(I<6)cylinder{M()#local D[I]=div(D[I],104);M().5,2pigment{
rgb M()}}N(D,(D[I]>99?I:I+1))#end#end#macro M()<mod(D[I],13)-6,mod(div(D[I
],13),8)-3,10>#end blob{N(array[6]{11117333955,
7382340,3358,3900569407,970,4254934330},0)}// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I have gamma set to 2.5 in the global statements of both scene files.
Unless gamma gets changed somewhere else.
-
tgq
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:3b980187@news.povray.org...
> Trevor Quayle <Tin### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> : They are the same but the colours do seem somewhat darker in POV 3.5
>
> It might be related to a different default gamma correction.
>
> --
> #macro N(D,I)#if(I<6)cylinder{M()#local D[I]=div(D[I],104);M().5,2pigment{
> rgb M()}}N(D,(D[I]>99?I:I+1))#end#end#macro M()<mod(D[I],13)-6,mod(div(D[I
> ],13),8)-3,10>#end blob{N(array[6]{11117333955,
> 7382340,3358,3900569407,970,4254934330},0)}// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darrell Miller wrote in message <3b97d6aa@news.povray.org>...
>i've noticed the same things.. pov 3.5 images seem a lot darker than
>MegaPov's with the same options..
I don't know about POV 3.1, but POV 3.5 does not set a display_gamma value
in the povray.ini file.
--
Mark
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3b97c69e@news.povray.org>, Tin### [at] hotmailcom
says...
> A glass sphere on a wood table with photons and focal blur.
>
> The first image was rendered in MegaPOV 0.7 - 11m 39s (1m 5s photons, 10m
> 34s trace)
> The second in POVRay 3.5b1 - 10m 5s (1s parse, 47s photons, 9m 17s trace)
>
> Both scenes are virtually identical (syntax excepted), any comments?
>
> -tgq
>
I have only 1 image here: is that me or is it not?
--
Regards,
Sander
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sander wrote:
>
> I have only 1 image here: is that me or is it not?
> --
I can see the two images.
Regards, Alberto
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
