 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Now the lenses are hidden nomore.
Question for radiosity wizards: this scene took 1h and 45 minutes to render,
so I decided to try with better settings: count 150 pretrace_start 0.08
pretrace_end 0.01 error_bound 0.1 and recursion_limit 2 but the results were
much worse! Many little artifacts, circle shaped... what is wrong? Should I
lower error_bound? Perhaps someone could suggest me some really high
radiosity settings...
Thanks in advance,
--
Jonathan.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'binos.jpg' (116 KB)
Preview of image 'binos.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
JRG wrote:
>
> Now the lenses are hidden nomore.
> Question for radiosity wizards: this scene took 1h and 45 minutes to render,
> so I decided to try with better settings: count 150 pretrace_start 0.08
> pretrace_end 0.01 error_bound 0.1 and recursion_limit 2 but the results were
> much worse! Many little artifacts, circle shaped... what is wrong? Should I
> lower error_bound? Perhaps someone could suggest me some really high
> radiosity settings...
recursion_limit 1 should be sufficient here, i would try something like:
radiosity {
count 300
nearest_count 7
error_bound 0.1
recursion_limit 1
}
lower error_bound could look good, but you have to use higher count then
too.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmx de>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Oh, now that's good! I just copy/pasted your settings and, after 2 hours (I
also used a better area_light), I got this one. Any suggestion to make it
closer to *extreme realism*?
Thanks,
--
Jonathan
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'binos.jpg' (111 KB)
Preview of image 'binos.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
JRG wrote:
>
> Oh, now that's good! I just copy/pasted your settings and, after 2 hours (I
> also used a better area_light), I got this one. Any suggestion to make it
> closer to *extreme realism*?
I have a pair almost identical to yours (the gripping ridges are rounded
not flat on mine (povspeak: cylinders ending in spheres)), but mine has
a lanyard/neck strap attached to it, doesn't yours? >:-}
Apart from that, the surface of the tubes looks more rubbery dull on
mine, but I know from experience, that that look is hard to get in pov.
/Ib
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message news:3b8b4d60@news.povray.org...
> Oh, now that's good! I just copy/pasted your settings and, after 2 hours (I
> also used a better area_light), I got this one. Any suggestion to make it
> closer to *extreme realism*?
>
Photons with caustics...
- Nekar
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom> in news:3b8b4d60@news.povray.org...
> Oh, now that's good! I just copy/pasted your settings and, after 2 hours (I
> also used a better area_light), I got this one. Any suggestion to make it
> closer to *extreme realism*?
make some environment to reflect in the glasses ...
Nice work so far ...
--
Jan Walzer <jan### [at] lzernet>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Ib Rasmussen" <ib### [at] ibrasdk> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:3B8### [at] ibrasdk...
> JRG wrote:
> >
> > Oh, now that's good! I just copy/pasted your settings and, after 2 hours
(I
> > also used a better area_light), I got this one. Any suggestion to make
it
> > closer to *extreme realism*?
>
> I have a pair almost identical to yours (the gripping ridges are rounded
> not flat on mine (povspeak: cylinders ending in spheres)), but mine has
> a lanyard/neck strap attached to it, doesn't yours? >:-}
It does... ;)
--
Jonathan
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Nekar Xenos" <j-p### [at] citywalkcoza> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:3b8b8ab7@news.povray.org...
>
> "JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:3b8b4d60@news.povray.org...
> > Oh, now that's good! I just copy/pasted your settings and, after 2 hours
(I
> > also used a better area_light), I got this one. Any suggestion to make
it
> > closer to *extreme realism*?
> >
> Photons with caustics...
In fact they are still there... :)
--
Jonathan
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
You're right. My mistake. :)
- Nekar
"JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message news:3b8c10df$1@news.povray.org...
>
> "Nekar Xenos" <j-p### [at] citywalkcoza> ha scritto nel messaggio
> news:3b8b8ab7@news.povray.org...
> >
> > "JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
> news:3b8b4d60@news.povray.org...
> > > Oh, now that's good! I just copy/pasted your settings and, after 2 hours
> (I
> > > also used a better area_light), I got this one. Any suggestion to make
> it
> > > closer to *extreme realism*?
> > >
> > Photons with caustics...
>
> In fact they are still there... :)
>
> --
> Jonathan
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
