 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'sh1.jpg' (66 KB)
Download 'sh2.jpg' (80 KB)
Download 'sh3.jpg' (61 KB)
Preview of image 'sh1.jpg'
Preview of image 'sh2.jpg'
Preview of image 'sh3.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Damn!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Damn!
Seconded.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
About three years ago, I had my kids come to the park with me for some
drawing lessons. I was pointing out how each tree had a mathematical nature to
it. We looked at how some trunks branch with predictable intervals, how branch
angle, thickness, and distribution were laid out, how there were just so many
divisions before you reached leaf level, etc.
In about an hour, they were looking at plants in a whole new light. We had
sketch pads and pencils and were counting the trunk-major-branch-minor
branch-twig numbers (how many divisions) and so forth. This is exactly that; a
set of algorithms to produce the tree based on a compact number of parameters.
It's nice to see that there are people who actually consider this sort of
data about the real world. But POVers often do, when you come right down to it.
Cheers!
Chip Shults
My robotics, space and CGI web page - http://home.cfl.rr.com/aichip
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> In about an hour, they were looking at plants in a whole new light.
We had
> sketch pads and pencils and were counting the trunk-major-branch-minor
> branch-twig numbers (how many divisions) and so forth. This is exactly
that; a
> set of algorithms to produce the tree based on a compact number of
parameters.
> It's nice to see that there are people who actually consider this sort
of
> data about the real world. But POVers often do, when you come right down
to it.
L-System (lyapunov) fractals.
The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants is a great read. Unfortunately out of
stock.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0387946764/starwarsportal/002-2809841
-2496806
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Wow, that looks even easier to use than the last version. Keep up the good work!
--
Tek
http://www.evilsuperbrain.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbrain com> wrote in message
news:3f413856$1@news.povray.org...
> Wow, that looks even easier to use than the last version. Keep up
the good work!
It is easier, and if I'm not mistaken, much faster. I like. :)
I just love it.
~Steve~
>
> --
> Tek
> http://www.evilsuperbrain.com
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Several people reported problem with saving include files.
I fixed that bug in version 1.2.1. It's available from the same link:
http://propro.ru/go/Wshop/tools/tools.html
Gena.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Seems to be a slow server connection everytime I try and download it anyway.
> Several people reported problem with saving include files.
> I fixed that bug in version 1.2.1. It's available from the same link:
> http://propro.ru/go/Wshop/tools/tools.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Neonux wrote:
>Seems to be a slow server connection everytime I try and download it anyway.
>
Yes, sometimes it's very slow. That site is in Siberia :)
If it's slow try to use the mirror in Spain:
http://www.txemijendrix.com/povtree.html
Gena.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
