 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Alrighty, so I'm fudging the first post parameters a little, but...
The second one is completely unrelated to the first and is something I
plan on elaborating with a few tricks I didn't utilize this time around
(and perfecting once I figure out how to texture certain things
specifically), though it took 10 hours to render at that quality, so I
think I'll wait until I have a final version before I do so again.
Everything I know how to do (which is very little) I've figured out in
the last three days (and yet somehow managed to get some work done). As
such I am awed at some of the things I've seen on this board, and am
glad I have high standards to work around.
-M.C. ArZeCh
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'testingitout.jpg' (45 KB)
Download 'testingitout3.jpg' (30 KB)
Preview of image 'testingitout.jpg'
Preview of image 'testingitout3.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Everything I know how to do (which is very little) I've figured out in
> the last three days (and yet somehow managed to get some work done).
OK, well I'm impressed! ;-)
> As
> such I am awed at some of the things I've seen on this board, and am
> glad I have high standards to work around.
Yeah, I know what you mean...
Neat images.
Andrew.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Looks pretty good to me for only three days!
What is taking ten hours in the second image. Is it the
focal blur?
Aaron
"Eleven" <pov### [at] xith net> wrote in message news:3EB### [at] xithnet...
> Alrighty, so I'm fudging the first post parameters a little, but...
>
> The second one is completely unrelated to the first and is something I
> plan on elaborating with a few tricks I didn't utilize this time around
> (and perfecting once I figure out how to texture certain things
> specifically), though it took 10 hours to render at that quality, so I
> think I'll wait until I have a final version before I do so again.
>
> Everything I know how to do (which is very little) I've figured out in
> the last three days (and yet somehow managed to get some work done). As
> such I am awed at some of the things I've seen on this board, and am
> glad I have high standards to work around.
>
> -M.C. ArZeCh
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sorry to hark on and on about this, but arnt first images are supposed to
involve a combination of reflective spheres & checker planes?
--
Rick
Kitty5 NewMedia http://Kitty5.co.uk
POV-Ray News & Resources http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rick [Kitty5] wrote:
> Sorry to hark on and on about this, but arnt first images are supposed to
> involve a combination of reflective spheres & checker planes?
>
My client is set to only download a finite number of headings, so
wherever the requirements were explicitly stated must not have ended up
in my inbox. I inferred "sphere and *reflective* plane" from the other
posts here (and hey, the shape is *made* out of spheres and has a sphere
cut out of it :P).
-M.C. ArZeCh
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Aaron Gillies wrote:
> Looks pretty good to me for only three days!
>
> What is taking ten hours in the second image. Is it the
> focal blur?
>
> Aaron
It's the focal blur (100 samples) and especially the area lighting. I
could let those slide were I not a perfectionist about certain things :P
-M.C. ArZeCh
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
