 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
So, after 5.5 days of tracing (with subsequent reboots to flush
the RAM), the image is ready. As the deadline is in just
a few days, I won't be able to make any significant changes.
One question though: I don't know if imprint of my signature on the
lower righthand corner is big enough. Anyone think I should
make it larger, or is it just fine (imagine the image printed with a
size of 18x24 cm or such, DIN A4 to be precise)?
So, comments and all very welcome, I'll keep them in mind for future
images, I won't change anything anymore on this one.
And thanks for all the help I got from the newsgroups!
--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Email: Tim### [at] gmx de
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'final.jpg' (81 KB)
Preview of image 'final.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Some more notes:
Photons (spacing .0005) were saved: 488 MB
-Using Dispersion or lower spacing "fragged" the RAM
Radiosity was saved: 7.83 MB
Peak memory used: 526 MB
Tracing time around 5 days = 120 hours
Image-File is 21.9 MB large.
--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Email: Tim### [at] gmxde
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Beautiful pic! I've thought of making prints of some of my Pov-Ray pics now
and then, just haven't created one that feels Poster friendly yet. Where are
you having this one printed. Is it for yourself?
> Photons (spacing .0005) were saved: 488 MB
> -Using Dispersion or lower spacing "fragged" the RAM
My god! I can't think of many scenes for which these settings wouldn't be
way overkill. And especially sonsidering the Photons in this picture are a
very subtle feature.
> Tracing time around 5 days = 120 hours
Not bad considering the size and settings.
> Image-File is 21.9 MB large.
Wohoo!:-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Well, the size is not the size of the post, its actually
3200x2400, so I can use 300dpi for the print.
I want to print it on a 600dpi Colorlaserprinter, but
I'm not too sure, if that'll work, so it'll probably be
a 300dpi Colorprinter.
Its not for me, its a gift for close friend.
And regarding the photons: overkill? Perhaps. But when
tracing in such an "overkill" size, and assuming that the
print will have an "overkill" dpi, I wanted to make sure to
get the most realism out of the image as I can get. Sure
needs patience for that...
Thomas Lake wrote:
> Beautiful pic! I've thought of making prints of some of my Pov-Ray pics now
> and then, just haven't created one that feels Poster friendly yet. Where are
> you having this one printed. Is it for yourself?
>
> > Photons (spacing .0005) were saved: 488 MB
> > -Using Dispersion or lower spacing "fragged" the RAM
>
> My god! I can't think of many scenes for which these settings wouldn't be
> way overkill. And especially sonsidering the Photons in this picture are a
> very subtle feature.
>
> > Tracing time around 5 days = 120 hours
>
> Not bad considering the size and settings.
>
> > Image-File is 21.9 MB large.
>
> Wohoo!:-)
--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Email: Tim### [at] gmxde
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Sir Charles W Shults III
Subject: Re: Final Gerberas - No more adjustments
Date: 3 May 2002 11:40:04
Message: <3cd2af54@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This is a truly fantastic image. IMHO, it will make you a serious
contender for the top position.
Cheers!
Chip Shults
My robotics, space and CGI web page - http://home.cfl.rr.com/aichip
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The glass looks great now. Good work.
--
#local i=.1;#local I=(i/i)/i;#local l=(i+i)/i;#local ll=(I/i)/l;box{<-ll,
-((I/I)+l),-ll><ll,-l,ll>pigment{checker scale l}finish{ambient((I/l)/I)+
(l/I)}}sphere{<i-i,l-l,(I/l)>l/l pigment{rgb((I/l)/I)}finish{reflection((
I/l)/I)-(l/I)specular(I/l)/I}}light_source{<I-l,I+I,(I-l)/l>l/l} // Steve
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Only thing i have to say is change the color of the signature. I can't read
it.
Tim Nikias wrote:
> So, after 5.5 days of tracing (with subsequent reboots to flush
> the RAM), the image is ready. As the deadline is in just
> a few days, I won't be able to make any significant changes.
>
> One question though: I don't know if imprint of my signature on the
> lower righthand corner is big enough. Anyone think I should
> make it larger, or is it just fine (imagine the image printed with a
> size of 18x24 cm or such, DIN A4 to be precise)?
>
> So, comments and all very welcome, I'll keep them in mind for future
> images, I won't change anything anymore on this one.
>
> And thanks for all the help I got from the newsgroups!
>
> --
> Tim Nikias
> Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
> Email: Tim### [at] gmxde
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I wouldn't mind seeing a high quality version of this at full res (because I
like to go "ooooooooh" at things).
But maybe that's just me.
"Tim Nikias" <tim### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
news:3CD272A2.E7D321C7@gmx.de...
> Well, the size is not the size of the post, its actually
> 3200x2400, so I can use 300dpi for the print.
>
> I want to print it on a 600dpi Colorlaserprinter, but
> I'm not too sure, if that'll work, so it'll probably be
> a 300dpi Colorprinter.
> Its not for me, its a gift for close friend.
>
> And regarding the photons: overkill? Perhaps. But when
> tracing in such an "overkill" size, and assuming that the
> print will have an "overkill" dpi, I wanted to make sure to
> get the most realism out of the image as I can get. Sure
> needs patience for that...
>
> Thomas Lake wrote:
>
> > Beautiful pic! I've thought of making prints of some of my Pov-Ray pics
now
> > and then, just haven't created one that feels Poster friendly yet. Where
are
> > you having this one printed. Is it for yourself?
> >
> > > Photons (spacing .0005) were saved: 488 MB
> > > -Using Dispersion or lower spacing "fragged" the RAM
> >
> > My god! I can't think of many scenes for which these settings wouldn't
be
> > way overkill. And especially sonsidering the Photons in this picture are
a
> > very subtle feature.
> >
> > > Tracing time around 5 days = 120 hours
> >
> > Not bad considering the size and settings.
> >
> > > Image-File is 21.9 MB large.
> >
> > Wohoo!:-)
>
> --
> Tim Nikias
> Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
> Email: Tim### [at] gmxde
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
news: 3cd2d123$1@news.povray.org...
> I wouldn't mind seeing a high quality version of this at full res (because
I
> like to go "ooooooooh" at things).
>
> But maybe that's just me.
>
Maybe not :c)
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks!
Top Position of what? And remember: It took me 2
months to get there...
"Sir Charles W. Shults III" wrote:
> This is a truly fantastic image. IMHO, it will make you a serious
> contender for the top position.
>
> Cheers!
>
> Chip Shults
> My robotics, space and CGI web page - http://home.cfl.rr.com/aichip
--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Email: Tim### [at] gmxde
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
