 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
So, this is the recent version of the Gerbera I'm modelling. There
are some minor issues I'm still looking over, but I guess this
is pretty much the final version. I'm not into modelling that
much (yet), and organic modelling is something very
complicated to do with pure POV. But I think when
just looking at it, it does look like a gerbera...
So, comments, suggestions?
--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'gerber1.jpg' (25 KB)
Preview of image 'gerber1.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 14:55:01 +0100, Tim Nikias <tim### [at] gmx de> wrote:
> So, comments, suggestions?
Very nice, but I wonder - have you used golden ration to build your plant ?
Have you know this method ? Or do you use just random generator ?
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I know of the Golden Ratio, but it wasn't used.
Where did you get that idea from?
> Very nice, but I wonder - have you used golden ration to build your plant ?
> Have you know this method ? Or do you use just random generator ?
--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 15:39:10 +0100, Tim Nikias <tim### [at] gmxde> wrote:
> I know of the Golden Ratio, but it wasn't used.
> Where did you get that idea from?
Becouse a few days before your first gerbera try I have posted link here to
page about golden ratio in nature.
http://www.mcs.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/R.Knott/Fibonacci/fibnat.html#seeds
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Becouse a few days before your first gerbera try I have posted link here
to
> page about golden ratio in nature.
> http://www.mcs.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/R.Knott/Fibonacci/fibnat.html#seeds
Cool link! I've always been fascinated by the golden ratio
Corey
> ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Looking great. have you modeled any of the green part behind the flower yet?
Regarding this and your grass mesh. It might be useful to include 3 or more
resolutions of each object in your vegetate.inc so that speed can be
improved for distant objects. Just a thought.
-Shay
Tim Nikias <tim### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
news:3CA320B5.12A75CF9@gmx.de...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Looking great. have you modeled any of the green part behind the flower yet?
>
Yup, I'll render at "behind the scenes view" ;-) and post as
follow-up.
> Regarding this and your grass mesh. It might be useful to include 3 or more
> resolutions of each object in your vegetate.inc so that speed can be
> improved for distant objects. Just a thought.
>
Ah, yes, the vegetation package. Well, the grass is of yet just a macro
to create a few patches, Level of Detail is something I have yet implement,
but its not difficult (detail settings are already set, just the macros for
LOD and object-placing aren't done yet). And the Gerbera is just
an "extra" for another, different project. But there will be similiar
flowers, and they'll have LOD.
--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
