POV-Ray: Newsgroups: povray.binaries.images: fakecloud

POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : fakecloud		Server Time 18 Nov 2024 18:32:13 EST (-0500)

From: Abe
Subject: fakecloud
Date: 13 Mar 2002 20:59:34
Message: <3C9003B4.8A5EBEAA@taconic.net>

...based on an approach by Vahur Krouverk for fake lightsourced clouds.

I thought I'd share this even though it's not very big and only backed
up by very messy code. Also, it is slower than media and not really as
pretty - I think I'm on to something here. It is a pigment done with
functions (no normals or displacements) applied to a large sky dome. (I
am _very_ grateful for the inclusion of functions in POV 3.5 and look
forward some day to a full shading language).

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'fakecloud.jpg' (6 KB)

Preview of image 'fakecloud.jpg'

From: Shay
Subject: Re: fakecloud
Date: 14 Mar 2002 09:26:31
Message: <3c90b317$1@news.povray.org>

Abe <bul### [at] taconicnet> wrote in message
news:3C9003B4.8A5EBEAA@taconic.net...


> ...based on an approach by Vahur Krouverk for fake lightsourced clouds.
>


Would you provide a link to this reference?
The clouds look good in this small pic. Is this really slower than media?

 -Shay



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Post a reply to this message

From: Christopher James Huff
Subject: Re: fakecloud
Date: 14 Mar 2002 13:23:51
Message: <chrishuff-377687.13233214032002@netplex.aussie.org>

In article <3C9003B4.8A5EBEAA@taconic.net>, Abe <bul### [at] taconicnet> 
wrote:

> ...based on an approach by Vahur Krouverk for fake lightsourced clouds.
> 
> I thought I'd share this even though it's not very big and only backed
> up by very messy code. Also, it is slower than media and not really as
> pretty - I think I'm on to something here. It is a pigment done with
> functions (no normals or displacements) applied to a large sky dome. (I
> am _very_ grateful for the inclusion of functions in POV 3.5 and look
> forward some day to a full shading 

These look very realistic...they are completely 2D? If so, they are 
definitely the best 2D clouds I have ever seen.

-- 
Christopher James Huff <chr### [at] maccom>
POV-Ray TAG e-mail: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
TAG web site: http://tag.povray.org/

Post a reply to this message

From: Abe
Subject: Re: fakecloud
Date: 14 Mar 2002 15:33:16
Message: <3C9108BC.1E776CFA@taconic.net>

Shay wrote:
> Would you provide a link to this reference?

http://www.aetec.ee/fv/vkhomep.nsf/dd5cab6801f1723585256474005327c8/b82cb3356d5285c542256983006016ed?OpenDocument
See the "fake clouds #2" example (somewhere in the middle of the page).
His code is in Renderman shading language, while I was trying to see if
anything was possible in POV 3.5.

> The clouds look good in this small pic. Is this really slower than media?

Well, I suppose it not really an honest comparison, simply because I am
not sure how you actually would approach a comparison - there are so
many ways of accomplishing a thing. However, compared with my general
media experiences, I'd say it's hardly faster. 

Abe

Post a reply to this message

From: Abe
Subject: Re: fakecloud
Date: 14 Mar 2002 15:35:24
Message: <3C91093C.337BC176@taconic.net>

Christopher James Huff wrote:
> 
> These look very realistic...they are completely 2D? If so, they are
> definitely the best 2D clouds I have ever seen.

Thanks!  
They are 2D.

Abe

Post a reply to this message

From: Dearmad
Subject: Re: fakecloud
Date: 17 Mar 2002 20:12:06
Message: <3C953F9A.567B7810@applesnake.net>

beautiful
-- 
Current obsession: "Ballet pour ma fille."
http://www.applesnake.net

Post a reply to this message