 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
hi,
a simple, short animation of a sphere (~25M, ~29secs), plays full-screen.
<drive.google.com/file/d/107xFAgCi1m7Ng-bVsemPRr_5K_V7lCRw/view?usp=sharing>
enjoy, jr.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 19/11/2025 16:08, jr wrote:
> hi,
> a simple, short animation of a sphere (~25M, ~29secs), plays full-screen.
> <drive.google.com/file/d/107xFAgCi1m7Ng-bVsemPRr_5K_V7lCRw/view?usp=sharing>
> enjoy, jr.
>
Interesting idea to show object from 4 points simultaneously, how did
you combined the views ? Also reminds me a paintings of Kazimir
Malevich ).
--
YB
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
hi,
yesbird wrote:
> On 19/11/2025 16:08, jr wrote:
> > ...
> Interesting idea to show object from 4 points simultaneously, how did
> you combined the views ?
"magick" </grin>. literally, the name of the command installed (on Slackware)
as part of the ImageMagick tools. it allows one to place images (in layers) on
a "canvas" and "flatten" those in an output image. will send an example later.
> Also reminds me a paintings of Kazimir Malevich ).
thank you. (Google and Wikipedia show many interesting paintings)
regards, jr.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"jr" <cre### [at] gmail com> wrote:
> hi,
>
> a simple, short animation of a sphere (~25M, ~29secs), plays full-screen.
>
> <drive.google.com/file/d/107xFAgCi1m7Ng-bVsemPRr_5K_V7lCRw/view?usp=sharing>
>
>
> enjoy, jr.
blue
green
red
metallic cube & sphere
Nice twist :)
Presumably you had a system for filenames for each of the panes?
I would imagine one could create a 5th animation scene to use the image maps
from the first 4, but imagemagick was probably 1000 times faster.
- bw
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
hi,
"Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
> ...
> blue
> green
> red
> metallic cube & sphere
"tut, tut.."
> Nice twist :)
thanks. (yes, all "that pain" for one little thing :-))
> Presumably you had a system for filenames for each of the panes?
yes, o/wise it'd be real work </grin>. I have a single scene file (plus .inc)
and four ini files, one "run_" per camera; frame/file names were
'*_[1234]_*.png'. also two "one-liner" shell scripts, to assemble the frames and
to convert to mp4.
> I would imagine one could create a 5th animation scene to use the image maps
> from the first 4, but imagemagick was probably 1000 times faster.
that would have been "the fallback", had I not "lucked out" with the ImageMagick
tools.
regards, jr.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
