|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks in part to Chris J.'s post of his lunar eclipse because that motivated me
to go ahead with rendering one up myself, here's the URL to my interpretation:
http://members.aol.com/persistenceofv/lunrclps.mpg ~740KB for a faster d/l
than if I had posted here. It's 400x300 res. 98 frames. Used two negative
spotlights behind the Earth to get the central and edge darkness, a regular
spotlight for the color and arealight for the sun.
Not physically accurate, just a quick fake. It got affected by some noise, from
the arealight jitter I think, in the image mapping so the Earth sparkles quite a
bit. I was trying a 'turbulence 0.1*clock' of the cloud map but it didn't seem
to change it. At least the clouds are rotated independently anyway.
In case anyone's thinking of mentioning the brightness of Earth I was going for
a very distant telescopic view, like Chris J. had said too, so it would
presumably be very bright compared to Earth orbit photos but I think I might
change it to look more like local proximity (and get rid of that ugly noise!).
Bob
--
omniVerse: "Not all really, and not all good at that."
http://users.aol.com/inversez/ (Home)
http://users.aol.com/xyzunknown/ (Links)
http://users.aol.com/iotadot/ (Gallery)
http://users.aol.com/persistenceofv/ (Anims)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Peter Warren
Subject: Re: My rendition of the Lunar Eclipse (link)
Date: 25 Jan 2000 05:38:14
Message: <388d7d16@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bob
I just look at this and think it's really good. It may not be physically
accurate but it works very well in illustrating an eclipse.
(Just an aside here, not a bash. I wish Outlook would let
me right click on the link and save it to disk.)
Peter
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Bob Hughes
Subject: Re: My rendition of the Lunar Eclipse (link)
Date: 25 Jan 2000 10:57:39
Message: <388dc7f3@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Huh? I use Outlook (Express 5) and it does a Save Target as... when a link is
right-clicked. I made sure and checked on my own post there, I use text for
posting and reading too. Don't know why you wouldn't be able to do the same, I
just use Outlook and don't know all about it but I wondered if you might have
HTML enabled accept there isn't any special settings like that for =reading= a
news message that I have here anyway. Hope you get that fixed, I use the
"right-click save as" a lot myself.
Oh yeah, and thanks for that fine comment, I'll take that :-)
Bob
"Peter Warren" <int### [at] halcyoncom> wrote in message
news:388d7d16@news.povray.org...
| Bob
|
| I just look at this and think it's really good. It may not be physically
| accurate but it works very well in illustrating an eclipse.
|
| (Just an aside here, not a bash. I wish Outlook would let
| me right click on the link and save it to disk.)
|
| Peter
|
|
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Mark Wagner
Subject: Re: My rendition of the Lunar Eclipse (link)
Date: 26 Jan 2000 01:21:44
Message: <388e9278@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bob Hughes wrote in message <388dc7f3@news.povray.org>...
>Huh? I use Outlook (Express 5) and it does a Save Target as... when a link
is
>right-clicked. I made sure and checked on my own post there, I use text
for
>posting and reading too. Don't know why you wouldn't be able to do the
same, I
>just use Outlook and don't know all about it but I wondered if you might
have
>HTML enabled accept there isn't any special settings like that for
=reading= a
>news message that I have here anyway. Hope you get that fixed, I use the
>"right-click save as" a lot myself.
>Oh yeah, and thanks for that fine comment, I'll take that :-)
He's using version 4.72.3110.1 (like me) and it doesn't have that feature.
Mark
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |