"Kenneth" <kdw### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> Alain <kua### [at] videotronca> wrote:
>
> >
> > Proposed key word : global_shadows on/off
> > Default is ON
>
> Exactly! My thought too.

thinking more like
    light_group{ BOOLEAN tokens...
where a missing BOOLEAN would denote the default.

Post a reply to this message

"green" <rov### [at] gmailcom> wrote:

>
> thinking more like
>     light_group{ BOOLEAN tokens...
> where a missing BOOLEAN would denote the default.

An interesting idea; less keyboard typing to do.

However, there is already a 'global_lights' keyword for light_groups, so its
'mate' should be a similar phrase (in my opinion), which would seem logical, as
the two phrases are so closely related as to the meaning of their operations.

Of course, this is all hypothetical right now. Clipka and the other developers
are probably thinking, "What?! ANOTHER new feature to add??"  :-P

Post a reply to this message

Am 05.05.2017 um 20:57 schrieb Kenneth:

> Of course, this is all hypothetical right now. Clipka and the other developers
> are probably thinking, "What?! ANOTHER new feature to add??"  :-P

No, actually I'm thinking "Yup, I guess we should implement something
like this"; I haven't looked too much at the details though to decide on
any particular syntax.

What I can say for sure is that it won't be in 3.7.1, and that it will
/not/ be `light_group { BOOLEAN ... }`.

Post a reply to this message

Le 17-05-05 à 09:03, green a écrit :
> "Kenneth" <kdw### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>> Alain <kua### [at] videotronca> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Proposed key word : global_shadows on/off
>>> Default is ON
>>
>> Exactly! My thought too.
> 
> thinking more like
>      light_group{ BOOLEAN tokens...
> where a missing BOOLEAN would denote the default.
> 
> 
> 
> 
Putting a naked boolean is a big no no.

Post a reply to this message